The letter from Bank of America Home Loans got right to the point. “We are pleased to inform you that we have approved your Home Equity Account for participation in a principal forgiveness program offered as a result of the Department of Justice and State Attorneys General global settlement with major mortgage servicers.” In the letter, which I obtained from an anti-foreclosure activist, Bank of America offered the homeowner full forgiveness of their entire home equity loan balance of over $177,000. But then Paragraph 5 came with an ominous warning: “Please be aware that we are required to report the amount of your cancelled principal debt to the Internal Revenue Service.”
Under current law, a principal reduction like this would be exempted from tax liability. However, that law, the Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act, expires at the end of the year, and after that, any mortgage debt forgiveness provided to a borrower will count as gross income for tax purposes, potentially costing millions of families several billion dollars. In the above case, the borrower would be required to pay taxes on the entire $177,000 amount forgiven by the bank, as if it were earned income. And that’s money that struggling homeowners simply don’t have.
“They wouldn’t be able to handle it,” said Peggy Mears of the Alliance of Californians for Community Empowerment, a community organizing group in California that has worked extensively on foreclosure issues. “If they could handle it, they wouldn’t be in arrears with their house notes. They don’t have that kind of money.”
The tax issue could significantly disrupt a still-fragile housing market and rob homeowners of the tools to pull themselves out of mortgage debt. It also represents a final indignity for homeowners who have been abused by the fraudulent mortgage practices of leading banks for years. Just when they think they get relief from their troubles, they get hit with a massive tax bill they cannot pay. “This has the effect of pulling people up with one hand, and hitting them in the face and knocking them over the cliff with the other,” said Sen. Jeff Merkley, D-Ore., who supports extending the law.
The issue dates back to 2007, when the housing bubble first started to deflate. Rep. Brad Miller, D-N.C., was tasked by the then-chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, Barney Frank , D-Mass., to find ways to help borrowers who would get caught up in the ensuing carnage. Miller’s search led him to Section 181 of the tax code. “I heard about the fact that interest reductions are not treated as income and principal reductions are, which creates a huge problem for modifying mortgages and solving the foreclosure crisis,” Miller said.
The odds of foreclosure largely correlate with a borrower’s level of indebtedness. A homeowner who’s “underwater,” meaning he or she owes more on the home than it’s worth, is far more likely to miss payments that a borrower with equity. And studies show that principal reductions do a far better job than any other kind of loan modification in helping borrowers maintain payments and avoid foreclosure. If you privilege other modifications through the tax code, like reducing the interest rate, over principal reductions, you punish those homeowners receiving the most sustainable type of modification, and eventually take them off the table, leading to a weaker housing recovery.
“I suggested to Barney [Frank] that we create an exemption for principal reductions,” Miller said. “Barney said to me, ‘Let’s go talk to Richie,’” meaning Richard Neal, the chairman of the tax-writing subcommittee in the House. Neal agreed to help, and the change got added as an amendment to an unrelated bill.
That first exemption lasted three years, but the foreclosure crisis lingered on beyond that. Democrats were able to include an extension in the larger deal that extended all of the Bush tax cuts for two years. Now the law is scheduled to expire again on Dec. 31, 2012. Any debt relief that completes after that date would be taxable.
The difference now is that principal reductions and other debt relief are set to become more widespread. Banks have been extremely resistant over the last several years to grant principal reductions, which forces them to take an up-front loss. Even if, over time, the greater probability of the borrower maintaining the payments makes it more cost-efficient for the bank than the risk of a bigger loss in foreclosure, banks do not want to mark the immediate loss on their books. In addition, mortgage servicers, who manage securitized loans sold to investors, get compensated through a percentage of unpaid principal balance, so principal forgiveness represents a direct cut into their profits.
Because of the mortgage settlement, banks are mandated to forgive at least $10 billion of principal, as a punishment for using false documentation to foreclose on homeowners, among other abuses. Though this is a relatively small amount of forgiveness (homeowners have roughly $700 billion in negative equity on their mortgages), the implications for the borrowers who receive it are significant. A $100,000 principal reduction for a family making the median adjusted gross income of $32,393 would calculate to an additional tax bill of roughly $21,200. And most homeowners threatened with foreclosure and in need of a principal reduction have far poorer finances than the median. “’I’m on unemployment and I just got a $20,000 tax bill?’” said Ira Rheingold of the National Association of Consumer Advocates. “This would be so counter to public policy, it makes absolutely no sense.”
In addition, the tax exemption also covers short sales, which have increasingly become an option for banks and homeowners to avoid foreclosure. In a short sale, the bank agrees to allow homeowners to sell their property for less than the value of their mortgage, forgiving the balance. The borrower walks away from the home without an eviction, the property sells at a higher price in a short sale than a foreclosure sale, and the bank doesn’t have the expense of maintenance and upkeep on the property between eviction and the foreclosure sale. Short sales increased 25 percent year-over-year in the first quarter of 2012. But if the exemption expires, the homeowner would have to pay tax on the balance forgiven by the bank in a short sale, making this option much less attractive.
The mortgage settlement added several other cases where homeowners would have to pay taxes on awards from banks. Under the settlement, up to 750,000 foreclosure victims, who have already lost their homes, will receive checks of $2,000 as compensation for foreclosure fraud. But the settlement language did not make clear that the cash reward represented compensatory damages, and as a result, these checks could be taxed. Similarly, service members stand to get compensation of $116,800 or more, due to a series of violations under the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act, including incidents where banks illegally foreclosed on military members while they were deployed overseas. But because of the vagueness of the language, they could be taxed as well. Rep. Brad Miller said he advised those involved in writing the settlement that they should try to make everything, including the mandated principal reductions, explicitly portrayed as compensatory damages, to ensure the exclusion from tax liability. “They had no idea what I was talking about,” Miller said.
At this point, only Congress can fix this problem by extending the exemption, and there are two parallel efforts underway to do so. Sen. Debbie Stabenow, D-Mich., has sponsored a bill, S.2250, which would prevent taxation on all debt forgiveness, like principal reduction or short sales, through the end of 2013. That bill has 17 co-sponsors, including four Republicans (Dean Heller, Scott Brown, Susan Collins and Johnny Isakson), as well as the support of the White House, which called for it in its proposed budget. Rep. Jim McDermott, D-Wash., has a more extensive bill in the House, H.R.4290, which would not only relieve the tax burden for principal forgiveness, but also exempt the direct cash payments to homeowners from the mortgage settlement. It would also stop banks from taking a deduction for any payments they make for Servicemembers Civil Relief Act violations. That bill has 42 co-sponsors, but no Republicans. “I wanted to put an idea out there and let it cook,” McDermott said. “I can’t ram it through, I can’t get a hearing on it in the Ways and Means Committee. But people can look at it, decide it’s a good idea, take it and shape it.”
Given that this is in essence a tax cut – the Congressional Budget Office estimates that excluding principal reductions from taxation for two more years will save recipients $2.7 billion — many Democrats in Washington believe that Republicans will eventually get onboard. But that’s no guarantee. “I’m not sure we can get that extended,” Rep. Miller said. “Republicans are not keen on principal reduction in the first place. When we extended the law in 2010, that was considered a give to Democrats.” Given that the tax issue would in all likelihood bring principal reductions to a screeching halt, Republicans could view resisting an extension as a way to stop something where they have ideological opposition. And it could be used as a bargaining chip in other negotiations.
In addition, it’s not like Congress has nothing to work on in the lame duck session, where this will probably get decided. Lawmakers must navigate a host of issues, including trillions of dollars in fiscal measures like the Bush tax cuts, the automatic sequester of $1.2 trillion in discretionary and defense spending, the alternative minimum tax and much more. With all this packed into a short space of legislating, the principal reduction issue could easily get lost in the shuffle. And it’s not as if Washington has made a priority out of granting relief to homeowners over the past several years. “In a rational world with a rational Congress, I would not be concerned,” Rheingold, of NACA, said. “But we don’t have that.”
At stake is the future of the housing market itself. Though analysts keep touting a bottoming out of prices and home sales, the numbers suggest that there’s still a long way to go, and the biggest stumbling block remains negative equity. “For us to get to a housing recovery, we really do need significant principal reduction,” said Rheingold. “As we’re seeing the first signs of doing any principal reduction or short sales, if this tax relief is allowed to expire, it would really do tremendous damage.”
But consumer and housing advocates have not engaged on the issue yet, though they have relentlessly demanded more principal reductions. “It’s not something that a lot of us have been thinking or talking about,” acknowledged Rheingold. “We’re thinking about implementation of the settlement, and whether there will be principal reductions, not these other hazards.” Housing advocates have called on Ed DeMarco, the head of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, to authorize principal reductions on loans owned by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. And his rejection of this has spurred calls for President Obama to fire him. But this issue, which would punish the beneficiaries of those principal reductions with a giant tax bill, has not generated the same level of outrage.
There’s still time for a fix. An extension would probably get folded into some other must-pass bill at the end of the legislative session, reasoned Sen. Merkley. There’s also the possibility of dealing with it retroactively sometime in 2013, before homeowners get the big surprise on their 2013 taxes. “I’ve heard no one defend the way the law will go,” Merkley said. Rep. McDermott, the lead sponsor in the House, saw options as well. “The legislative process can move very rapidly when it wants to,” he said. “When there’s a will, there’s always a way. What’s troublesome is finding out if anybody cares.”
Peggy Mears, of ACCE, said that her organization would begin to talk to its members about the issue. “We’re going to refuse to give up fighting for homeowners,” she said. “It would be a shame for people in Congress to pull money out of the consumer’s pockets.”
Without a strong push from outside advocates and attention from lawmakers, an extension will be a challenge. And homeowners abused by banks throughout the mortgage process would suffer a final nightmare courtesy of the Internal Revenue Service. “Of all the tax changes likely to expire,” Rep. Brad Miller said, “this is the one that causes me the most concern.”
Link to original article from Salon
Economic and Social Justice -
The Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership is the latest plan of conglomerates to strengthen their grip over the planet.
A corporate world order is emerging, and like any parasite, it is slowly killing off its host. Unfortunately, the "host" happens to be the planet, and all life upon and within it. So, while the extinction of the species will be the end result of passively accepting a corporate-driven world, on the other hand, it’s very profitable for those corporations and their shareholders.
The Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) is the latest...
Andrew Gavin Marshall | AlterNet 12 May 2013 Hits:138 ESJ Articles
The US-EU free trade pact and the Trans-Pacific Partnership are about securing regulatory gains for major corporate interests.
In polite circles in the United States, support for free trade is a bit like proper bathing habits: It is taken for granted. Only the hopelessly crude and unwashed would not support free trade.
There is some ground for this attitude. Certainly, the US has benefited enormously by being able to buy a wide range of items at lower cost from other countries. However, this does not mean that most people in the country...
Dean Baker 02 May 2013 Hits:146 ESJ Articles
Wage theft is fast becoming a top trend of the 21st-century labor market.
Imagine you’ve just landed a job with a big-time retailer. Your task is to load and unload boxes from trucks and containers. It’s back-breaking work. You toil 12 to 16 hours a day, often without a lunch break. Sweat drenches your clothes in the 90-degree heat, but you keep going: your kids need their dinner. One day, your supervisor tells you that instead of being paid an hourly wage, you will now get paid for the number of...
Lynn Stuart Parramore | AlterNet 28 Apr 2013 Hits:786 ESJ Articles
Hundreds of New York City's lowest-paid workers walked off the job Thursday at over 60 of the city's fast food restaurants to say, "We deserve better."
In what people are calling the largest ever protest of its kind, over 400 workers from the country's biggest corporate "food" chains—including McDonald’s, Wendy’s, Pizza Hut, and KFC among others—took part in the action.
“We deserve better," said Glenda Soto, a McDonald's worker. "I work very hard. I’m a single mom, I have 3 kids, and on $7.25 an hour I can’t support them, and I...
Lauren McCauley | Common Dreams 04 Apr 2013 Hits:281 ESJ Articles
The proposed cuts now on the table could be seriously bad news for young people planning to enter the workforce in coming years.
For most teens and twentysomethings, the raging debate in Washington over Social Security reform probably seems as relevant and engaging as PBS’s Friday night lineup of Antiques Roadshow and Jerry Lewis: Live from Las Vegas.
But the proposals on the table could be seriously bad news for young people planning to enter the workforce in coming years.
President Obama has offered to break the sequester gridlock by recalculating inflation in a way...
Scott Klinger | AlterNet 24 Mar 2013 Hits:442 ESJ Articles
Millennials have accumulated less wealth since entering the workforce than their parents did at the same age, even as the economy has grown and the average wealth of Americans has doubled.
When Vernardo and Claire Simmons-Valenzuela married, they imagined all the trappings of a middle-class life. Soon enough, they had kids. Claire finished a master's degree. They held jobs as an Army medic and a physician's assistant. They dreamed of next steps: owning a home, taking their first vacation in years. Vernardo would return to school for a bachelor’s in nursing....
Zach Duffy | Campus Progress 23 Mar 2013 Hits:482 ESJ Articles
Ramon Suero fell behind on his mortgage payments after he got fired for organizing a union.
Suero, a hotel worker and UNITE HERE Local 26 member in Boston, got his job back after a year. But then his wife had to quit hers and travel to the Dominican Republic to care for her sick mother—and they fell further behind.
They applied to modify their home loan, but federally sponsored mortgage company Freddie Mac said no, foreclosed, and demanded the family get out by February 1.
The Sueros aren’t...
Alexandra Bradbury | Labor Notes 18 Mar 2013 Hits:302 ESJ Articles
Leaving her husband became the only option for "Stacy" after he became violent with the children. She returned to her hometown, Las Cruces, NM, with her 5 little boys in tow. Other than lacking an emergency family shelter, this is a pleasant mid-sized city. The family stayed for a while at the domestic violence shelter. Her time there ended without her finding housing, and she scrambled for a desperate, stopgap solution: her mother’s old, tiny camper.
For $300 a month, including utilities, the family could park their leaky camper in a park in her town. She...
Diane Nilan | AlterNet 18 Mar 2013 Hits:514 ESJ Articles
Debates over the fairness of the tax code are as old as the federal income tax itself. A cornerstone of the tax — established a century ago, by the 16th Amendment — has been the principle that those who make more should pay more, while lower tax rates help the poor to support their families and depend less on government benefits.
That social compact shifted into high gear during the Nixon administration, which tried to incentivize work by rewarding low-income households with a tax break that became the nation’s most successful...
KATHERINE S. NEWMAN | The New York Times 13 Mar 2013 Hits:392 ESJ Articles
The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) reported a large increase in jobs in February as compared to January. At the same time the January jobs data was revised lower, which gave a boost to the February number. Let’s look at what happened to the people behind the numbers.
This graph shows two sets of data: the Employment to Population ratio and the Labor Force Participation rate. These are updated with February data.
They show that the percent of the population employed has not changed in February....
Randy Shannon | PDA Pennsylvania 10 Mar 2013 Hits:199 ESJ Articles
AFT President: "This is not about how to fix public schools, but to close them."
Philadelphia is going to shutter 23 public schools following a vote Thursday night by the School Reform Commission, despite an emotional protest and numerous arrests, exemplifying the city's continued embrace of privatized school reform at the mercy of the public school system.
Critics of the closures point to the disproportionate number of minority children impacted, arguing that the move would further discourage students from enrolling in public schools, fueling a growing push towards...
Lauren McCauley | Common Dreams 08 Mar 2013 Hits:558 ESJ Articles
In 1996, I signed the Defense of Marriage Act. Although that was only 17 years ago, it was a very different time. In no state in the union was same-sex marriage recognized, much less available as a legal right, but some were moving in that direction. Washington, as a result, was swirling with all manner of possible responses, some quite draconian. As a bipartisan group of former senators stated in their March 1 amicus brief to the Supreme Court, many supporters of the bill known as DOMA believed that its...
Bill Clinton | The Washington Post 08 Mar 2013 Hits:382 ESJ Articles
Today the Dow Jones Industrial Average rose above 14,270 – completely erasing its 54 percent loss between 2007 and 2009.
The stock market is basically back to where it was in 2000, while corporate earnings have doubled since then.
Yet the real median wage is now 8 percent below what it was in 2000, and unemployment remains sky-high.
Why is the stock market doing so well, while most Americans are doing so poorly? Four reasons:
First, productivity gains. Corporations have been investing in technology rather than their workers. They get tax credits and deductions...
ROBERT B. REICH | ROBERT REICH 06 Mar 2013 Hits:383 ESJ Articles
When the Americans with Disabilities Act was signed into law almost 23 years ago, the idea of inclusion for people with disabilities was legally born. Ramps were built, infrastructure was redesigned and, for the first time, the law backed people with disabilities who demanded their right not to be blocked from physical access to facilities.
But more than two decades the ADA became law, the ideal of inclusion has yet to be fully realized. Because enforcement of the statute is largely complaint-based, many public businesses are still inaccessible for people in...
Reid Davenport | Open Secrets Blog 06 Mar 2013 Hits:339 ESJ Articles
California Teamsters are paying to lose their jobs because of a scheme called the California Twilight Enterprise Zone Program.The program allows businesses to receive tax breaks of $37,500 for each new employee they hire in one of California's 40 Enterprise Zones. The program encouraged two Teamster employers to dump their union workers, move to an Enterprise Zone, hire cheaper workers and get tax breaks in the bargain.One employer, Atlanta-based Blue Linx, is a building products distributor. And get this: it lists "safety, respect and learning" as its values for "People." VWR is...
Teamster Nation Blog 06 Mar 2013 Hits:391 ESJ Articles
Thank you for being among the over 400 organizations, representing more than 15 million Americans, that co-signed the letter to Congress expressing deep concerns about the proposed Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) and opposition to the outdated "Fast Track" trade negotiating and approval process.
Your joint letter was submitted to Congress today, and it couldn't have been more timely. The letter comes just one business day after the President included Fast Track in his 2013 Trade Policy Agenda, and the same day as negotiators from 11...
Arthur Stamoulis | Citizens Trade 04 Mar 2013 Hits:401 ESJ Articles
During the Great Recession, the wealth gap between whites and African-Americans nearly doubled, leaving white with nearly 22 times as much in household wealth. According to a new study from Brandeis University’s Institute on Assets and Social Policy, this merely exacerbated a much longer trend during which the wealth of whites exploded while that of African-Americans stagnated:
In 2009, a representative survey of American households revealed that the median wealth of white families was $113,149 compared with $6,325 for Latino families and $5,677 for black families.
Looking at the same set of families over a...
Pat Garofalo | Think Progress 03 Mar 2013 Hits:433 ESJ Articles
One spring afternoon, O. Perry Walker High School Principal Mary Laurie made her way to the school's courtyard, where a lone student sat at a picnic table with a large stack of papers in front of him and a frustrated look on his face. Laurie recognized the student as a shy senior with one of the highest GPAs in his class.
The documents, it turned out, were all from Tuskegee University. Tuskegee had accepted the 18-year-old, offering him a full scholarship. But they required a $500 deposit within the next few...
SARAH CARR | The Atlantic 02 Mar 2013 Hits:380 ESJ Articles
On Wednesday, the US Supreme Court will hear a case that has the potential to give big corporations free rein to write contracts that prevent consumers from ever holding them accountable for fraud, antitrust violations, or any other abuses of consumer and worker protection laws now on the books. It's a case that hasn't gotten much attention, but should.
The case, Italian Color v. American Express,was brought by a California Italian restaurant and a group of other small businesses that tried to sue the credit card behemoth for antitrust violations. They allege...
Stephanie Mencimer | Mother Jones 02 Mar 2013 Hits:617 ESJ Articles
For the social compact of the United States, most of the Congressional Progressive Caucus has gone missing.
While still on the caucus roster, three-quarters of the 70-member caucus seem lost in political smog. Those 54 members of the Progressive Caucus haven’t signed the current letter that makes a vital commitment: “we will vote against any and every cut to Medicare, Medicaid, or Social Security benefits -- including raising the retirement age or cutting the cost of living adjustments that our constituents earned and need.”
More than 10 days ago, Congressmen Alan Grayson...
Norman Solomon | Common Dreams 02 Mar 2013 Hits:508 ESJ Articles
Rebecca Williams has waited tables, on and off, for 30 years. A lot has changed since her first stint in the business ended in the early 1990s. Restaurants now tout their commitment to local and organic fare. Diners eagerly pass and poke at tapas-style small plates. Chefs at brick-and-mortar restaurants now compete with a growing legion of food trucks. But one thing that's remained consistent in all that time is Williams' paycheck.
Williams, 50, has worked mostly at upscale bistros in Atlanta, Ga., earning $2.13 an hour before tips. It's the...
Dave Jamieson | Huffington Post 02 Mar 2013 Hits:495 ESJ Articles
Kathleen VonEitzen heads into work at 10 p.m. with a long night ahead of her. A trained baker, VonEitzen spends the evening and early morning hours cutting and shaping trays…
You may have seen charts like the one to the right from theEconomic Policy Institute, showing how working people’s wages stopped going up along with productivity gains.
This means the gains…
Changes in tax law that reduced the federal tax rate on capital gains income is “by far the largest contributor” to rising income inequality in the United States, according to…
CHICAGO - "Their story of enslavement and their escape started in the slums of Manila. Sleazy 'recruiters' scoured the streets and lured the workers here with assurances of plenty of…
Last October, Anthony M. Van Buren drove 135 miles south from his home in Charlottesville, Va., to the small town of Moneta in search of his former boss, Robert Brown,…
The human body, with its need for rest, nutrition and hydration, is such an inefficient tool for capitalist production. But while machines are unlikely to replacehuman workers anytime soon, new technologies…
How could Barack Obama say, in his State of the Union speech, “let’s declare that in the wealthiest nation on earth no one who works full-time should have to live…
WASHINGTON — Incomes rose more than 11 percent for the top 1 percent of earners during the economic recovery, but not at all for everybody else, according to new data.
I firmly believe that at some point during his second administration President Obama is going to address the issue of mass incarceration in America. What I fear is…
Contact us at:email@example.com
PDA is organized around several core issues. These issues include:
Each team hosts a monthly conference call. Calls feature legislators, staffers and other policy experts. On these calls we determine PDA legislation to support as well as actions and future events.
Our special guest this month is Marc Armstrong, the Executive Director of the Public Banking Institute in California. Marc will be discussing the problems with our banking system and the possibility of public state-owned banks as a potential...
Monthly call with special guest, Cathy L. Hurwit, Chief of Staff for US Representative Jan Schakowsky (IL-09). Cathy will be discussing Rep. Schakowsky's Emergency Jobs Act, the CPC 'Back to Work Budget,' and other jobs legislation.
Special guest Arthur Stamoulis, the Executive Director of the Citizens Trade Campaign will discuss the urgent proximate issue in Congress of Fast Track legislation. He will review highlights of the Trans Pacific Partnership and how Fast Track...
CALL AGENDA: Lori Wallach provided background on the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP)--who's involved with it, who's opposing it--with special focus on Trade Unions. She'll also identify the key issues and timeline, and finally discuss next steps...
Logan Martinez, member of the National Jobs for All Coalition Executive Committee
Mike Hersh, PDA Staff Member
We will discuss:
how the fight for jobs is connected to the fight for equality,
the connection between...
Featured Guest - Mel Rothenberg from the Chicago Political Economy Group
Since the 2010 election PDA has worked to build a movement for economic and social justice around key legislation introduced by members of the Congressional Progressive...