Across the country, momentum has been building for an amendment to the U.S. Constitution declaring that the democratic rights and freedoms granted to people do not apply to corporations and corporate entities.
In November alone, local voters in Colorado, Montana, Maine, Wisconsin and California passed various resolutions to ban corporate personhood. Seven bills have been introduced in the current Congress, including four this month—including amendment proposals. Public interest groups have been gathering petition signatures, all with an eye to the two-year anniversary of a Supreme Court ruling, known as Citizens United, which granted significant new political powers to corporations by ending a century-old prohibition on directly spending money from their corporate treasuries for political campaigns.
A constitutional amendment proposed by Congress must pass House and Senate chambers with two-thirds majorities and then be ratified by three-fourths of the states. The last amendment, passed in 1992, concerned congressional pay and was proposed in 1789. The 26th Amendment, which lowered the voting age to 18, passed in 1971, after tens of thousands of youths that age died in Vietnam but could not vote. Though the political equivalent of climbing Mt. Everest, supporters of an amendment to reverse or reign in corporate constitutional rights are not deterred.
“We are facing a crisis in American democracy today,” said John Bonifaz, co-founder and director of Free Speech for People, who has been involved with various proposals in Congress. “The question is whether it is ‘We the people’ or ‘We the corporations.’ The response to that crisis has to be a bold vision that will restore democracy to the people. Constitutional amendment fights are the very kind of fights that return us to the basic principles of what we are as a nation.”
The effort to restrain the power of corporations by targeting American democracy's foundational document—the Constitution—is not without critics or controversy, even in progressive circles. There are varying proposed amendments, based on smaller and larger reform visions. There are fears that undoing corporate powers entrenched in federal and state law would harm non-profits and labor unions, and cause other unintended effects. However, what is undeniable is there is broad support—not just in Occupy Wall Street protests but among middle-class Americans as evidenced by mainstream media polls—for tangible steps to restoring the balance of power between big business and individual citizens.
“If we were able to get the big money out of politics, what more would you really want to do?” non-profit lawyer Greg Colvin asked.
Which Problem? Which Solution?There are two threads among the various amendment proposals. The narrower approach, which Colvin embraces, seeks to address two U.S. Supreme Court rulings, 35 years apart. One allowed for unlimited campaign spending and the other granted excessive power to corporate money in elections.
The first of those rulings, Buckley v. Valeo, said spending money in campaigns is speech protected by the First Amendment. Though Buckley said donations to candidates could be regulated, it struck down limits on campaign spending by candidates and by independent groups – limits passed by Congress in the wake of the Watergate scandal.
The second ruling, Citizens United, voided a 2002 reform that was Congress’ most recent effort to address the problems of our campaign finance system, but went much further to grant constitutional rights to corporations. It said that not only can corporations spend unlimited sums in elections, but restricting such spending would create “a disadvantaged person or class.”
In essence, the Supreme Court in Citizens United, said that corporations have explicit First Amendment protections—the same rights and liberties as citizens. And those speech rights do not just apply to political campaigns. There is ongoing litigation in many federal and state courts where corporations are fighting government regulation by saying they are unconstitutionally being forced to speak by putting warnings on their products.
So there are two schools of thought on how broad or narrow a constitutional amendment proposal should be. Some of the earliest ones simply seek to overturn Buckley by saying Congress and the states have the power to regulate the way money is raised and spent in political campaigns. “If people had the upper-hand in out electoral system, would we still think it necessary to abolish all other corporate constitutional rights. Maybe, maybe not,” said Colvin, who suggested language saying that only citizens can donate to campaigns, that states and Congress could regulate the donations and expenditures, and also institute public financing.
But Bonifaz and advocates such as Rep. Jim McGovern, D-MA, who last week introduced amendment legislation to overturn corporate personhood, believe that solely addressing the problem posed by Buckley – of unlimited campaign spending, including, now, unlimited campaign spending by corporations – is not sufficient.
“I am on the same page as those who say we must overturn Buckley and have limits on campaign spending. I have led the fight in the courts for that for years,” Bonifaz said. “We must also have a response to the Citizens United ruling. It cannot solely be within the campaign finance frame. The Citizens United ruling is the most extreme extension of a corporate rights doctrine that has been eroding our democracy and our Constitution for 30 years.”
Intended and Unintended ConsequencesThe word “corporation” does not appear in the U.S. Constitution. Where corporations enter the law—as has been the case for all of American history—begins at the state level, where businesses are registered, chartered, regulated, taxed, and all manner of activities that constitute doing business in America. The Constitution’s framers were very clear that economic interests did not have the same rights as citizens. After all, the Revolutionary War was fought against unfair and excessive economic exploitation by Great Britain.
As the decades of American history and law unfolded, the use of the terms "corporation" and "persons" and other business entities became blurred and interchangeable, especially when states or Congress adopted new laws. But the Constitution was not amended in a manner granting corporations new rights and freedoms that belonged to people—such as the right to vote, to bear arms and so forth. Instead, corporate litigators going back to the Industrial Revolution began making arguments before the Supreme Court to try to prompt the court to extend to big businesses—such as railroads—the same protections that people were afforded under the Bill of Rights and other amendments.
There has been an ebb and flow of those rights and powers for more than a century. But in the past 30 years, culminating in Citizens United, the balance of power between individuals and corporations has swung away from average citizens to the richest and most powerful institutions. That is because they have found new ways to spend money in campaigns and have been awarded new speech rights in federal court.
What lawyers like Colvin fear about an amendment that seeks to overturn corporate personhood are the unintended consequences. On one hand, he said it would do too little—not stopping wealthy individuals from spending their own money. And it would do too much, he said, saying it could take away the ability for non-profits and unions to participate in politics under the current rules. For example, should the Sierra Club and ACLU have the right to privacy of membership lists? Should Planned Parenthood have the right to a lawyer in court; or protection against self-incrimination or double jeopardy?
"You want to minimize unintended consequences," Colvin said. "Sometimes it is better to figure out how things would be different if you make one change and see what that brings. If you get the big money out of elections, the corporate and wealthy donors would have less impact."
Colvin supports the recent amendment proposal by Rep. Ted Deutch, D-FL, that restricts constitutional rights of for-profit corporations but carves out an exception for non-profits.
But Bonifaz, in contrast, believes that all corporations, whether for-profit or non-profit, should not be awarded the same rights as people under the Constitution.
“Remember, Citizens United was a non-profit,” he said, referring to the advocacy organization that wanted to distribute an anti-Hillary Clinton video before 2008 primaries with financial support of corporate backers. That was not allowed under the federal McCain-Feingold campaign finance law and was challenged, ending up in the Supreme Court.
Bonifaz said it would be risky to carve out exception for some corporations, even non-profits, because that could open up loopholes that would be abused by interests with the means and motives to do so. He countered that non-profits and some unions (not all are organized as corporations) would not be threatened under the broader proposal he and Congressman McGovern supports.
“Individual members of non-profits maintain all of the rights guaranteed to people under the Constitution. They do not need the artificial form of a corporation – for-profit or non-profit – to assert their individual constitutional rights,” he said. “The fundamental question here is whether we elevate corporations to have the same rights of people under the Constitution or whether we restore democracy and our Constitution to the people.”
The Debate ContinuesWhile progressives will continue to debate what constitutional rights corporations should have, it is important to remember what supporters of corporate constitutional rights have said.
Chief Justice John Roberts, during arguments in the Citizens United case before the high court ruled, said, “A large corporation, just like an individual, has many diverse interests.” In the same hearings, Justice Antonin Scalia said corporations are “indistinguishable from the individual that owns them.” And pro-corporate activists, such as Center for Conservative Politics founder and chairman Bradley Smith, said corporations are bodies made up of individual people with “attendant free-speech rights.”
But even the current Supreme Court has issued rulings underscoring that corporations do not have the same constitutional rights as people. In January 2011, it ruled that they do not have the right of personal privacy to evade the federal Freedom of Information Act requests — which AT&T had argued was an invasion of personal privacy.
In other words, beyond the rhetoric that all speech should be embraced in a democracy – even if it is by business entities that are licensed by states, that do not vote, that do not have rights to bear arms, and have no privacy rights under FOIA – this debate will continue.
“We need a constitutional amendment debate,” Bonifaz said. “I think it’s quite vibrant that there are various versions.”
Link to original article from AlterNet
End Corporate Rule -
WASHINGTON — Today the Senate roundly defeated a Republican filibuster that had been preventing the Senate from moving to consideration of the Democracy For All Amendment. The Senate is expected to take up the Amendment following the expiration of post-cloture debate time. People For the American Way Executive Vice President Marge Baker released the following statement:
“Achieving a full Senate debate on the amendment is a historic step forward in the movement to take back our democracy from powerful corporations and billionaires.
“The American people are angry that their voices are being...
Marge Baker | People for the American Way Vice President 08 Sep 2014 Hits:375 ECR Articles
This Monday marks a momentous day: the U.S. Senate will vote on a constitutional amendment to reverse the U.S. Supreme Court's disastrous decisions in cases like Citizens United and McCutcheon.
"Billionaires buying elections is not what American democracy is about and it is not what our Constitution stands for," said Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT), writing in the July/August edition of The Progressive.
This vote is a victory for many in the movement that started calling for amending the Constitution four years ago, after the 2010 Citizens United decision opened the floodgates to...
The Progressive, Inc. 05 Sep 2014 Hits:386 ECR Articles
Andrew Sabin gave Republicans so much money in 2012 that he accidentally went over a limit on how much individuals could donate to federal candidates and party committees.
So Sabin, who owns a New York-based precious-metals refining business, was delighted when the Supreme Court did away with the limit in April. Since then, he has been doling out contributions to congressional candidates across the country — in Colorado, Texas, Iowa and “even Alaska,” he said.
Top Republicans have taken notice: Sen. Ted Cruz (Tex.) and Florida Gov. Rick Scott have paid him...
04 Sep 2014 Hits:207 ECR Articles
It would be a shock to most Americans when eventually 300million people realize that they have been and are being fooled and manipulated. If anyone were to say “the US Government is run by Wall Street, mega corporations, their lobbyists and the super-rich” they are certainly not far from the truth. The knowledge of this should drive home why countries are being invaded and companies end up gaining the contracts while placing their own American soldiers in harms way. It should also make people begin to realize why freedom of...
Shenali D Waduge | SinhalaNet 24 Aug 2014 Hits:680 ECR Articles
A Pentagon contract announced this week sheds new light on the controversy over corporate inversions, and how tough the federal government really will be on all those companies skedaddling to Europe to avoid paying income taxes.
Pentagon purchasing agents awarded Abbott Laboratories of North Chicago a $19.5 million contract for technology that diagnoses brain injuries, even though the medical products company recently cut a deal that will poke a hole in Uncle Sam's coffers. Inversions enable companies to escape relatively high U.S. corporate tax rates by reincorporating overseas through an acquisition.
Joe Cahill | Crain's Chicago Business 22 Aug 2014 Hits:256 ECR Articles
A Colorado lawmaker wants to end a long-running practice that fuels mistrust of the federal government.
After retiring from office or losing re-election, many congressional lawmakers — Republicans and Democrats alike — launch lucrative careers as lobbyists at law firms, lobbying shops, business and trade organizations, and other well-heeled interest groups, many of which are located on the infamous K Street.
Sen. Michael Bennet introduced a bill this month to ban that. The bill, which he introduced along with Sen. Jon Tester, D-Mont., would prevent former members from lobbying Congress permanently.
Raju Chebium | Coloradoan 03 Aug 2014 Hits:605 ECR Articles
With the recent rulings of this right-wing dominated Supreme Court, it was hard to celebrate our nation's 238th birthday this past July 4th. Indeed, the Hobby Lobby decision delivered a hard blow not just to women in the workplace, but to the basic rights of all Americans. Essentially, the five Roberts Radicals gave corporations the right to refuse to deliver coverage provided in the Affordable Care Act to female employees for contraception and access to reproductive healthcare if it conflicted with the religious beliefs of their employers. One might wonder...
Pearl Korn | Huffington Post 15 Jul 2014 Hits:395 ECR Articles
Constitutional amendments are often proposed but rarely advanced to the stage of serious debate. What moves any meaningful amendment from mere paperwork to serious consideration is the popular will of the great mass of Americans. And the popular will of the great mass of Americans have been abundantly clear since the United States Supreme Court struck down barriers to corporate control of democracy with its 2010 Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission ruling.
Sixteen American states and roughly 600 communities have formally told Congress that the Constitution must be amended to...
John Nichols | The Nation 11 Jul 2014 Hits:262 ECR Articles
The US government does not represent the interests of the majority of the country's citizens, but is instead ruled by those of the rich and powerful, a new study from Princeton and Northwestern Universities has concluded.
The report, entitled Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens, used extensive policy data collected from between the years of 1981 and 2002 to empirically determine the state of the US political system.
After sifting through nearly 1,800 US policies enacted in that period and comparing them to the expressed preferences of...
Zachary Davies Boren | The Telegraph 17 Apr 2014 Hits:1005 ECR Articles
Companies do not have a right to lie to their shareholders, a German judge ruled this week. But sometimes, she added, lies are necessary.
And with that Carola Wittig, a judge in the state court in Stuttgart, dismissed a suit filed by a group of hedge funds that lost a lot of money when Porsche Holding, the owner of the Porsche automaker at the time, lied about its intentions regarding Volkswagen.
“It was hardly possible to react to public speculation about a takeover of VW except with a denial,” the court explained...
Floyd Norris | New York Times 23 Mar 2014 Hits:519 ECR Articles
Think of Dixie, and your mind probably conjures something like "Duck Dynasty" — bearded men bouncing along dirt roads in pickup trucks, raucously waving rebel flags.
You probably wouldn’t think of black-tied bankers cavorting in the plush ballroom of Manhattan's St. Regis hotel. But were you to peek inside the recent gathering of a secret Wall Street society, you’d have witnessed investment banking tycoon Warren Stephens taking the stage in a Confederate flag hat, performing an ode to finance to the tune of “Dixie." "In Wall Street land we’ll take our...
Lynn Stuart Parramore | AlterNet 27 Feb 2014 Hits:597 ECR Articles
Talk about revenge of the C students! The nation’s biggest telecom company, Comcast, which took over NBCUniversal a year ago, wants to buy the second biggest company, Time-Warner Cable, to create an empire of 30-million subscribers. That’s a third of all American homes with cable for its TV, internet service and telephones.
The merger has to be approved by federal regulators as being in the public interest and not a monopoly. How Comcast, the world’s largest media company and one of America’s most reviled companies threads that needle will be a...
Steven Rosenfeld | AlterNet 14 Feb 2014 Hits:899 ECR Articles
Sen. Al Franken launched a petition on Tuesday calling for the overturning of the U.S. Supreme Court decision known as Citizens United, the 2010 ruling that has been widely held responsible for allowing an unprecedented influx of anonymous corporate money into local and national politics.
By Friday, the site-based petition had received nearly 229,000 individually verified signatures on MoveOn.org, including a lengthy list of outraged and pleading comments.
“In Citizens United, the Supreme Court ruled for the first time that corporations are guaranteed the same free speech rights as real people to...
Carey L. Biron | Mint Press News 20 Jan 2014 Hits:1648 ECR Articles
JESSICA DESVARIEUX, TRNN PRODUCER: Welcome to Real News Network. I'm Jessica Desvarieux in Baltimore.
A toxic spill in West Virginia's Elk River has left 300,000 local residents without water for the past week. The leak came from a storage facility for chemicals used to process coal, and it's left many wondering if industry regulations are too lax, especially for the company responsible for the leak, Freedom Industries.
Let's take a look at what the president of the company had to say after being pressed by a local reporter about mapping out a...
Jessica Desvarieux | The Real News Network 20 Jan 2014 Hits:649 ECR Articles
Hobby Lobby, a chain of crafts stores, closes on Sundays, costing its owners millions but honoring their Christian faith.
The stores play religious music. Employees get free spiritual counseling. But they do not get free insurance coverage for some contraceptives, even though President Obama’s health care law requires it.
Hobby Lobby, a corporation, says that forcing it to provide the coverage would violate its religious beliefs. A federal appeals court agreed, and the Supreme Court is set to decide on Tuesday whether it will hear the Obama administration’s appeal from that decision...
Adam Liptak | The New York Times 25 Nov 2013 Hits:882 ECR Articles
The European Union said it plans to close a loophole in the corporate tax code that allows some companies to pay little or no tax by routing profits abroad, amid a mounting furor over the tax practices of major corporations such as Apple Inc. and Google Inc.
The proposal by the European Commission, the EU’s executive arm, aims to boost tax revenue for national budgets at a time of biting austerity and ensure that companies pay a fair amount of tax.
“We can no longer afford freeloaders who reap huge profits in...
Tom Fairless | The Wall Street Journal 25 Nov 2013 Hits:748 ECR Articles
The conservative American Legislative Exchange Council is wading back into election issues, as it considers supporting a bill that would increase the role of state legislatures in the election of U.S. senators, chipping away at the powers vested directly in the people under the 17th Amendment.
ALEC circulates model legislation to state legislators, and its bills have resulted in states passing laws related to voter ID, so-called Stand Your Ground issues and the elimination or reduction of state income taxes.
In early December, a group of ALEC members are scheduled to consider...
Amanda Terkel The Huffington Post 15 Nov 2013 Hits:688 ECR Articles
The American people created the post office. The American people can still save the post office. But we need to do something right now.
In July 2011 the United States Postal Service (USPS) management announced it would rapidly close 3600 local post offices and eventually as many as 15,000. And shutter half the nation’s mail processing centers.
A frenzy of grassroots activity erupted as citizens in hundreds of towns mobilized to save a treasured institution that plays a key and sometimes a defining role in their communities. Only when Congress appeared ready...
David Morris | On the Commons 05 Nov 2013 Hits:672 ECR Articles
Way under the radar screen of Big Media, which is too busy wallowing around in every flaw of the early glitches of healthcare.gov to notice anything else going on no matter how important, is a hugely consequential Senate confirmation fight happening this week. This fight may well have a bigger impact on our economy than any other confirmation this fight. The Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) has not had an official chief for years now, but after too long a delay President Obama nominated a solid, well-respected North Carolina congressman...
Mike Lux | Huffington Post 30 Oct 2013 Hits:643 ECR Articles
In its landmark 1976 decision Buckley v.Valeo, the Supreme Court affirmed the constitutionality of laws aimed at “the prevention of corruption and the appearance of corruption spawned by the real or imagined coercive influence of large financial contributions on candidates’ positions and on their actions if elected to office.”
In that light, let’s take a look at the record of campaign contributions to Spencer Bachus, a Republican congressman from Alabama and a prime example of the interaction between special interest campaign contributions and the legislative process.
For all intents and purposes, Bachus,...
Thomas B Edsall | The New York Times 18 Oct 2013 Hits:712 ECR Articles
As the federal government shutdown continues, Secretary of State John Kerry heads to Asia for secret talks on a sweeping new trade deal, the Trans-Pacific Partnership. The TPP is often referred to by critics as "NAFTA on steroids," and would establish a free trade zone that would stretch from Vietnam to Chile, encompassing 800 million people — about a third of world trade and nearly 40 percent of the global economy. While the text of the treaty has been largely negotiated behind closed doors and, until June, kept secret from...
Amy Goodman | Democracy NOW! 18 Oct 2013 Hits:985 ECR Articles
The latest wrecking ball flailing around in the rubble of America’s election and campaign finance laws, McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission, will be argued in the Supreme Court on October 8. Once again we can expect counsel and some members of the Court to be on the lookout for deviant, “forbidden” thinking about money and democracy.
As in Citizens United in 2010, the Arizona public funding case in 2011 (American Free Enterprise Club’s Freedom Club PAC v. Bennett), and the Montana challenge to Citizens United in 2012 (American Tradition Partnership v. Bullock),...
Jeff Clements | ACS 08 Oct 2013 Hits:890 ECR Articles
Every week the Truthdig editorial staff selects a Truthdigger of the Week, a group or person worthy of recognition for speaking truth to power, breaking the story or blowing the whistle. It is not a lifetime achievement award. Rather, we’re looking for newsmakers whose actions in a given week are worth celebrating. Nominate our next Truthdigger here.
The extreme want of coverage of the Trans-Pacific Partnership trade deal in even the independent, alternative press is a testament to the near-complete domination of politics and the news media by transnational corporate interests....
06 Oct 2013 Hits:783 ECR Articles
That's over and above our payments to the big companies for energy and food and housing and health care and all our tech devices. It's $6,000 that no family would have to pay if we truly lived in a competitive but well-regulated free-market economy.
The $6,000 figure is an average, which means that low-income families are paying less. But it also means that families (households) making over $72,000 are paying more than $6,000 to the corporations.
1. $870 for Direct Subsidies and Grants to Companies
The Cato Institute estimates that the U.S. federal...
Paul Buchheit | Common Dreams 30 Sep 2013 Hits:1034 ECR Articles
To quote famed short seller David Einhorn: “No matter how bad you think it is, it’s worse.” On the “corruption among what passes for our elites” front, this story about self-dealing in the privatization of the Postal Service gives an indication of how bad things really are.
By way of backstory: the Postal Service is being plundered through the device of a completely fabricated financial crisis. The mail provider has been widely declared to be broke, but that’s utter hogwash. Congress has created the appearance of financial ill health via a...
Yves Smith | Naked Capitalism 26 Sep 2013 Hits:962 ECR Articles
An amendment dubbed the "Monsanto Protection Act," which currently allows large agriculture and biotech corporations to ignore court orders involving the safety of genetically modified seeds, has been stripped from Senate's spending bill that could be voted on as early as Wednesday afternoon.
Following an organized campaign against the provision in recent months, its removal was being cheered by food safety and environmental activists as a victory.
The Monsanto Protection Act, otherwise known as the Farmer Assurance Provision rider, was wedged into a stop-gap budget bill that passed earlier this year and signed into law...
Jacob Chamberlain | Common Dreams 25 Sep 2013 Hits:717 ECR Articles
Today, the Center for Media and Democracy (CMD), publishers of the award-winning ALECexposed.org, launched OutsourcingAmericaExposed.org, a web resource devoted to helping taxpayers identify the corporations seeking to privatize public assets and services in their communities: including their schools, roads, prisons, drinking water, court systems, and more.
Once a week for the next several weeks, CMD will unveil corporate profiles of America’s most notorious corporations that are quietly working with state and local lawmakers to take over public services with little accountability, along with in-depth examinations of the CEOs personally profiting from...
Center for Media and Democracy's PRWatch 24 Sep 2013 Hits:771 ECR Articles
Discussions about removing government management of the U.S. air-traffic control system are the most serious in two decades, prompted by budget cuts and uncertain funding for converting to satellite navigation.
Leaders of the U.S. air-traffic controllers’ union and a private-pilot lobbying group, once fierce opponents of taking control of the system away from the Federal Aviation Administration, have endorsed talks on other ways to manage and pay for aviation safety.
“There are conversations taking place among the stakeholders,” Gerald Dillingham, civil aviation director of the U.S. Government Accountability Office, said in an...
Alan Levin | Bloomberg 24 Sep 2013 Hits:769 ECR Articles
In a letter to Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke dated June 27, 2013, US Representative Alan Grayson and three co-signers expressed concern about the expansion of large banks into what have traditionally been non-financial commercial spheres. Specifically:
[W]e are concerned about how large banks have recently expanded their businesses into such fields as electric power production, oil refining and distribution, owning and operating of public assets such as ports and airports, and even uranium mining.
After listing some disturbing examples, they observed:
According to legal scholar Saule Omarova, over the past five years, there has...
Ellen Brown | Common Dreams 31 Aug 2013 Hits:935 ECR Articles
The Center for Media and Democracy filed a letter with the Texas Attorney General on Thursday refuting efforts by the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) to declare itself immune from the state's open records law. Texas is the first known state where ALEC has formally asked an Attorney General for an exemption from sunshine-in-government laws, and it marks a new low in the organization's attempts to advance its legislative agenda in secret and avoid public accountability for facilitating special interest influence.
“You cannot just create a special private club between lobbyists...
Center for Media and Democracy 19 Aug 2013 Hits:913 ECR Articles
Congressman Darrell Issa really is determined to end the United States Postal Service as Americans know it—indeed, as Americans have known it for more than 200 years.
Issa, the powerful chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, has a long history of attacking the postal service. But, now, he has taken advantage of a manufactured crisis to get his committee to vote twenty-two to seventeen in favor of a “Postal Reform Act of 2013” that American Postal Workers Union president Cliff Guffey warns “will lead to the demise of...
John Nichols | The Nation 17 Aug 2013 Hits:1383 ECR Articles
As part of our ongoing focus on the American Legislative Exchange Council, or ALEC, we checked in with health insurance executive turned industry whistleblower Wendell Potter to learn about ALEC’s efforts to influence the health care debate and undermine The Affordable Care Act (a.k.a. Obamacare).
Lauren Feeney: ALEC turned 40 last week. How long has the organization been involved in trying to influence the health care debate?
Wendell Potter: I don’t know whether insurance companies were part of the initial founding of the organization, but I’m sure they were involved early on. Health insurance is regulated largely...
Lauren Feeney | Bill Moyers.com 14 Aug 2013 Hits:670 ECR Articles
For two weeks, protesters have been living in a tent city outside a post office in Berkeley, California. The participants are staging the sleep-in to save the post office from closing, one of many closures facing post offices all across the country.
The United States Postal Service last week reported a net loss of $740 million in the third quarter—hemorrhaging many conservative leaders claim bolsters their argument that the USPS is antiquated and post offices should be closed.
It makes sense that the postal service has proven to be a popular target...
Allison Kilkenny | The Nation 13 Aug 2013 Hits:573 ECR Articles
Student after student on Wednesday took to the podium at a public board meeting of the Chicago Public Schools (CPS) to deliver a unified message against efforts by Mayor Rahm…
When I learned last winter that I would have a seat on the Senate Banking Committee, I was very happy because I knew it would give me the opportunity to…
For Republicans who want to cut the number of food stamp recipients, here’s a helpful suggestion: Support the ordinance passed last week by the D.C. Council, which required big-box stores…
The global day of protest against the giant corporation Monsanto was a major success, as two million people showed up in cities around the world.
The global day of protest against…
A fundamental struggle for democracy is going on behind the scenes in statehouses around the country, as a handful of wealthy individuals and foundations pour money into efforts to privatize…
At the April Conference Call for the End Corporate Rule Issue Team, PDA endorsed the American Anti-corruption Act. I hope you'll go to http://www.represent.us and become a co-sponsor of the…
Failed gun control legislation and a fertilizer plant explosion reveal how poisoned by big money our government is.
If you want to see why the public approval rating of Congress is…
We now have 12 states whose legislatures have formally endorsed an amendment overturning Citizens United v. FEC (four of which have specifically endorsed ending corporate personhood): California, Colorado, Connecticut, Hawaii,…
The banksters are cashing in off their own disaster. The big banks are buying up distressed real estate by the boat load, and renting or selling it back to the…
Contact us at:firstname.lastname@example.org
PDA is organized around several core issues. These issues include:
Each team hosts a monthly conference call. Calls feature legislators, staffers and other policy experts. On these calls we determine PDA legislation to support as well as actions and future events.
Listen to this month's call as plans are made to get the Udall Amendment passed in the United States Senate. We will be discussing the upcoming vote in the Senate, who is on the bill and who is not, our PDA letter drop, the ongoing work on other...
Listen in this month for exciting updates. The Udall Amendment is moving with a companion bill in the House. Postal office facilities are schedule to be closed. We also discussed where to go with the 21st Century Glass-Steagall Act of 2013,...
Listen for exciting updates on the Hobby Lobby case, the Udall Amendment's movement, Eric Cantor has stepping down form leadership, where we are going with the 21st Century Glass-Steagall Act of 2013, and more, plus what our next steps.
Join us this month as we discuss Hobby Lobby case, the actions we will be taking regarding the Udall amendment, movement on the Equal Rights Amendment, other constitutional amendments, and much more.
Listen to this month's call as the team discusses the new Glass-Steagall bill, constitutional amendments, including the ERA, the newly handed down McCutcheon decision by the Supreme Court, as well as the what happened on our Hill Day (incidentally...
Click the link above and listen to End Corporate Rule's monthly call covering the new Glass-Steagall legislation, the Better Off Budget, what to do regarding further attacks on the Post Office, Sen. Sanders' hearing on single payer, the Nolan...