Stop Voter Suppression
NAACP Looks to UN in Fight Against Increasing US Voter Suppressio
The NAACP is sending representatives next week to a session of the United Nations Human Rights Council in Geneva, Switzerland to argue that minority community members are facing clear voter suppression efforts in the United States, NAACP President Ben Jealous said during a press call on Thursday.
McClatchy reports: "The Geneva appearance is part of an NAACP strategy rooted in the 1940s and 1950s, when the group looked to the United Nations and the international community for support in its domestic battle for civil rights for blacks and against lynching."
"This will be the first time in decades that we as an organization are before the council with a specific complaint about actions being taken here in the US," Jealous said during the call. "The first time was in 1947, when W.E.B. Du Bois delivered his speech and appealed to the world." And continued:
"Now, like then, the principal concern is voting rights. In the past year, more states have passed more laws, pushing more voters out of the ballot box, than at any point since the rise of Jim Crow. We have seen ... voters have their votes blocked by specific states like South Carolina, Texas, Mississippi, Wisconsin and so forth during the past 12 months. These include strict voter-ID bills, so-called registration-ID bills, bans on formerly incarcerated people voting and a range of other mechanisms that diminish access to the polls among minority populations."
McClatchy adds:
Since last year, 15 states have passed new voting laws; currently 38 states, including some of those 15, are weighing legislation to require people to show government-approved photo identification or provide proof of citizenship before casting their ballots.
Other changes adopted or under consideration by states include restricting voter registration drives by third-party groups such as the League of Women Voters and the NAACP; curtailing or eliminating early voting; doing away with same-day voter registration; and rescinding the right to vote of convicted felons who have served their time. [...]
The NAACP, civil liberties groups, voting experts and some lawmakers say the new laws smack of poll taxes and literacy tests — devices that in previous generations blocked blacks from voting.
A study last year by New York University's Brennan Center for Justice said the new laws "may sharply tilt the political terrain for the 2012 election" by restricting voting access to 5 million people — most of them minority, elderly, young or low-income earners.
States that have adopted new laws account for 171 electoral votes in 2012 — or 63 percent of the 270 electoral votes needed to win the presidency, the Brennan Center report said.
The study also found that more than 21 million Americans don't possess government-issued photo identification. The NAACP estimates that about 25 percent of African-Americans nationwide don't possess the proper documentation to meet ID requirements.
The Root.com adds:
It is unknown how binding a U.N. recommendation would be, Jealous acknowledged. But a negative ruling would help shame state officials into doing the right thing, he said. Such a ruling could hurt states in the pocketbook because many leaders seek investments overseas, he said. "It's not good business to be seen as an active abuser of human rights," he said.
The NAACP is scheduled to make an oral presentation on March 14 and afterward will present its report titled "Defending Democracy: Confronting Modern Barriers to Voting Rights in America" (pdf), which was released in December. The report found that 11 percent of Americans do not have government-issued identification. Among African Americans, 25 percent do not have the documents required to vote.
The report also noted that 14 states, mostly Republican-led, have enacted 25 restrictive voting measures. Legislators in states that have passed the measures say the laws are important because they help prevent identity fraud at the ballot box.
Lastly, Jealous added: "The U.N. is the world's forum for both promoting and defending democracy. In these hyper-partisan times in the U.S., we believe it is important for them to weigh in on what is happening here in our democracy. Our democracy is precious, not just to the citizens of this country but to the world."
Link to original article on Common DreamsVoter Suppression - VS-DRA Articles

Richmond, VA- Concerning the Governor’s actions related to voter ID legislation, SB 1256, the following statement can be attributed to Claire Guthrie Gastañaga, ACLU of Virginia Executive Director: The ACLU of Virginia is extremely disappointed that Governor Bob McDonnell has chosen to sign legislation requiring photo ID at the polls for all voters. There is no evidence of need for such legislation, particularly after the Commonwealth enacted an enhanced ID requirement last year. There is not one case of voter impersonation fraud in Virginia, the only voter fraud that photo ID...
ACLU Virginia 28 Mar 2013 Hits:393 VS-DRA Articles
Read more
Arizona imposed stricter voter registration requirements. But the GOP doesn't want to stop there. The U.S. Supreme Court is hearing oral arguments today to decide whether an Arizona statute that imposes restrictions on voter registration conflicts with federal law. The case could potentially decide the balance between the state and federal governments when it comes to elections and voting rights. After becoming law in Arizona, the bill at issue was adopted as a "model" by the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC). The case, Arizona v. Inter Tribal Council of Arizona, arises in...
Brendan Fisher | PR Watch 23 Mar 2013 Hits:920 VS-DRA Articles
Read more
President Obama earned one of the loudest rounds of applause during his fourth State of the Union address when he declared, “We ...
Ari Berman | The Nation 11 Mar 2013 Hits:553 VS-DRA Articles
Read more
In oral arguments before the Supreme Court last week, Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. introduced a statistical claim that he took to imply that an important provision of the Voting Rights Act has become outmoded. Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act, which is being challenged by Shelby County, Ala., in the case before the court, requires that certain states, counties and townships with a history of racial discrimination get approval (or “pre-clearance”) from the Department of Justice before making changes to their voting laws. But Chief Justice Roberts said...
Nate Silver | The New York Times 10 Mar 2013 Hits:368 VS-DRA Articles
Read more
We do not have to guess what the states currently subject to a key provision of the Voting Rights Act will do if the Supreme Court grants their wish to have that provision declared unconstitutional — top Republicans in those states have already told us. In a brief filed last August, Republican attorneys general from six of the states covered, at least in part, by Section 5 of the Voting Right Act complained that this landmark legislation is all that stands between them and implementing a common methos of disenfranchising minority...
Ian Millhiser | Think Progress 03 Mar 2013 Hits:564 VS-DRA Articles
Read more
Pop champagne: Racism is over. "There is an old disease, and that disease is cured," Bert Rein, the attorney leading the legal challenge to the Voting Rights Act—the landmark law intended to ensure all Americans can vote—told to the Supreme Court on Tuesday. "That problem is solved." Rein represents Shelby County, Alabama, one of the jurisdictions covered by a key section of the Voting Rights Act called Section 5. Under Section 5, parts of the country with histories of discriminatory election practices have to ask for permission—or "preclearance," in legal terms—from the Justice...
Adam Serwer | Mother Jones 03 Mar 2013 Hits:417 VS-DRA Articles
Read more
If you listen to the court watchers reacting to Wednesday’s oral arguments in Shelby County v. Holder, you might be bracing yourself for a roll back of voting rights. They are largely predicting the formula used to determine which states and localities are subject to or “covered” by the preclearance provision of the Voting Rights Act (VRA) will be struck down by the Supreme Court. This isn’t the first time we’ve heard these prognostications. In 2009, similar predictions abounded in a similar case, Northwest Austin Municipal Utility...
Myrna Pérez | Brennan Center for Justice 01 Mar 2013 Hits:418 VS-DRA Articles
Read more
On Wednesday, the U.S. Supreme Court will review the Voting Rights Act of 1965In Shelby County v. Holder, the Court will hear arguments on Section 5 -- the heart of the Voting Rights Act -- that allows the federal government to block state election practices that are discriminatory. A predominantly white county in Alabama, Shelby County, charges that the decision of Congress in 2006 to reauthorize Section 5 is unconstitutional. The case comes on the heels of a federal election last fall in which our nation witnessed the...
Penda D. Hair and Benjamin Todd Jealous | Common Dreams 26 Feb 2013 Hits:468 VS-DRA Articles
Read more
President Obama made a good start in his State of the Union speech at honoring his election night promise to fix the breakdowns that left tens of thousands of Americans standing in hours-long lines at the polls last November. His moving introduction of 102-year-old Desiline Victor, who had to wait for six hours at a North Miami precinct to cast her ballot, humanized the threat to democracy posed by the rickety machinery of our elections. And in creating a Commission on Election Administration and tapping a...
Bob Edgar | Huffington Post 14 Feb 2013 Hits:315 VS-DRA Articles
Read more
In 2006, Congress voted overwhelmingly to reauthorize key provisions of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 for another twenty-five years. The legislation passed 390–33 in the House and 98–0 in the Senate. Every top Republican supported the bill. “The Voting Rights Act must continue to exist,” said House Judiciary chair James Sensenbrenner, a conservative Republican, “and exist in its current form.” Civil rights leaders flanked George W. Bush at the signing ceremony. Seven years later, the bipartisan consensus that supported the VRA for nearly fifty years has collapsed, and conservatives are...
Ari Berman | The Nation 08 Feb 2013 Hits:447 VS-DRA Articles
Read moreRelying again on the tie-breaking vote of Lt. Gov. Bill Bolling, Republicans in the evenly divided Virginia Senate on Tuesday narrowly passed a bill that would require nearly all voters to present a form of photo identification in order to cast a ballot. Final approval of Senate Bill 1256, sponsored by Sen. Mark D. Obenshain, R-Harrisonburg, is contingent upon funding the estimated cost of providing free photos to registered voters who do not have an accepted form of photo ID. A similar bill died in...
Jim Nolan | Richmond Times Dispatch 06 Feb 2013 Hits:457 VS-DRA Articles
Read more
In the run up to the 2012 election (as in every presidential election since at least 2004), Ohio was again at the center of controversy. On early voting, provisional ballots, and more, the Ohio Secretary of State’s office took positions that we strenuously opposed because they would make it more difficult for Ohioans to cast ballots that would be counted. But this post isn’t about those controversies. It’s about an important step taken by the Ohio Secretary of State’s Office to ensure the ballots of...
Vishal Agraharkar | Brennan Center for Justice 31 Jan 2013 Hits:369 VS-DRA Articles
Read more
Republicans Obenshain, Bell, candidates for attorney general, put forth proposals. A year after controversial voter identification legislation passed the Virginia General Assembly, several Republican lawmakers are proposing even greater restrictions on the identification required to cast a ballot, including the requirement of photo identification. Del. Robert B. Bell, R-Albemarle, will introduce what he terms “Photo ID — No Exceptions,” a measure that would require voters to present valid government-issued photo identification in order to vote. Acquiring the identification would also require proof of U.S. ...
Jim Nolan | Richmond Times Dispatch 08 Jan 2013 Hits:421 VS-DRA Articles
Read more
Voter ID laws were one of the most contentious issues of the past election season. (Here is everything you need to know about the laws.) Proponents insisted IDs should be required at polling places in order to thwart fraud. But there has been little evidence of such fraud and Democrats argued that the laws were meant to suppress voters. The impact of the laws on this past election isn't clear. But one thing is clear: There are still pushes for the laws in many states. So what happens next? We've rounded up the...
Suevon Lee | Pro Publica 28 Dec 2012 Hits:412 VS-DRA Articles
Read more
Number of states where Republican lawmakers passed new voting restrictions in the run-up to this year's election that critics said would suppress the youth, African-American and Hispanic vote: more than 12 Number of days by which Florida's Republican lawmakers reduced the state's 14-day early voting period amid concerns over strong Democratic turnout in 2008: 6 As a consequence, hours that Juanita Morales of Miami-Dade County, Fla. waited in line to cast a ballot during early voting while tethered to an oxygen tank: more than 4 Wait that...
Sue Sturgis | Facing South 15 Nov 2012 Hits:508 VS-DRA Articles
Read more
CLEVELAND — Thousands of lawyers from both presidential campaigns will enter polling places next Tuesday with one central goal: tracking their opponents and, if need be, initiating legal action. It will be a kind of Spy vs. Spy. The lawyers will note how poll workers behave, where voters are directed, if intimidation appears to be occurring, whether lines are long. And they will report up a chain of command where decisions over court action will be made at headquarters in Chicago and Boston. This will go...
Ethan Bronner | New York Times 02 Nov 2012 Hits:569 VS-DRA Articles
Read more
Voter ID measures have mostly been blocked. But there are plenty of other hijinks that have liberals on edge for Election Day. A few months ago, Democrats were convinced that voter ID laws were Republicans' secret plan to steal the election. But as Election Day nears, these and other allegedly suppressive efforts -- from Florida's attempt to purge voter rolls to Ohio's move to restrict early voting to Pennsylvania's strict voter ID law -- have mostly fizzled, thanks largely to legal challenges from the Justice Department,...
Molly Ball | The Atlantic 01 Nov 2012 Hits:692 VS-DRA Articles
Read more
With a little more than a week before Election Day, grassroots campaigns are hoping to maximize voter participation among often disenfranchised communities. Cuéntame has launched a series of public service announcements targeted at some 50,000 new Latino voters in three swing states: Colorado, Nevada, and Florida. The PSAs, made in conjunction with 300 partner groups, are airing on major Spanish language television stations like Univision, MundoFox, and Azteca America. But it’s not all good news. Our community journalists write in that schemes...
Aura Bogado | Colorlines 26 Oct 2012 Hits:948 VS-DRA Articles
Read more
It may be less than 150 monitors and observers, but a UN affiliated organization (the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE)) will be in the US on Election Day to report on any perceived irregularities. According to The Hill, the delegation is coming at the request of US Civil Rights groups concerned about the massive national effort by the Republican Party to keep non-GOP voting groups from casting ballots: Civil rights groups met with representatives from the OSCE this week to raise their fears about what they say...
Mark Karlin | Buzzflash 22 Oct 2012 Hits:1094 VS-DRA Articles
Read more
Teresa Sharp is fifty-three years old and has lived in a modest single-family house on Millsdale Street, in a suburb of Cincinnati, for nearly thirty-three years. A lifelong Democrat, she has voted in every Presidential election since she turned eighteen. So she was agitated when an official summons from the Hamilton County Board of Elections arrived in the mail last month. Hamilton County, which includes Cincinnati, is one of the most populous regions of the most fiercely contested state in the 2012 election....
Jane Mayer | The New Yorker 22 Oct 2012 Hits:1026 VS-DRA Articles
Read more
A man originally reported to have been working for the Republican Party of Virginia was arrested by the Rockingham County, Va., Sheriff’s Office on Thursday and charged with attempting to destroy voter registration forms by tossing them into a dumpster behind a shopping center in Harrisonburg, Va. “Prosecutors charged him with four counts of destruction of voter registration applications, eight counts of failing to disclose voter registration applications and one count of obstruction of justice,” according to a report late Thursday afternoon from TPM’s Ryan Reilly....
Brad Friedman | The Brad Blog 21 Oct 2012 Hits:1469 VS-DRA Articles
Read more
Arizona’s Apache County is obscuring the collective power of the Native vote in an unprecedented way. The County, which has previously violated the Voting Rights Act, has inaccurately placed more than 500 people who attempted to register on a list that could permanently purge these would-be voters from the rolls. And most, if not all, of those affected are Navajo. Naomi White wanted to vote in Arizona’s primary in August, and wants to vote on Election Day in November. White had previously voted in Utah,...
Aura Bogado | The Nation 20 Oct 2012 Hits:737 VS-DRA Articles
Read moreWashington, D.C. – South Carolina voters will not need to show a photo ID to vote in this year’s election, a federal court ruled Wednesday, the latest in a series of legal victories against restrictive voting laws. The court ruled there was not enough time left to implement the law for 2012. It will be in effect for future elections, but the court clarified aspects of the law so that it “does not require a photo ID to vote.” Instead, South Carolinians can continue to use their non-photo ...
Brennan Center for Justice 18 Oct 2012 Hits:691 VS-DRA Articles
Read more
Democrats are frustrated: Why can’t Republican voters see that Republicans pass voter ID laws to suppress voting, not fraud? Democrats know who tends to lack ID. They know that the threat of in-person voter fraud is wildly exaggerated. Besides, Republican officials could hardly have been clearer about the real purpose behind these laws and courts keep striking them down as unconstitutional. Still, Republican support remains sky high, with only one third of Republicans recognizing that they are primarily intended to boost the GOP's prospects. How can Republican voters go on believing that the...
Jeremiah Goulka | TomDispatch 15 Oct 2012 Hits:1009 VS-DRA Articles
Read more
The struggle over state-sponsored legislation limiting or redefining how and when citizens can vote has generated contentious debate. Judith Browne Dianis, Co-Director of Advancement Project, a non-partisan organization dedicated to civil rights and racial justice, has been a vocal opponent of state photo-ID laws and other restrictive measures. In an interview with New America Media’s Khalil Abdullah, Browne Dianis explains why she has concluded a new amendment on the right to vote to the U.S. Constitution is necessary.New America Media: Why do...
Khalil Abdullah, New America Media | Interview 14 Oct 2012 Hits:581 VS-DRA Articles
Read more
(Reuters) - A new South Carolina law that generally requires voters to show photo identification does not discriminate against racial minorities but cannot go into effect until the start of next year, a federal court ruled on Wednesday. The U.S. District Court three-judge panel said too little time remains before the November 6 general election for state officials to implement the law this year. The decision was unanimous. Republican governors and state lawmakers across the country have renewed the push for photo-identification requirements...
David Ingram | Reuters 10 Oct 2012 Hits:651 VS-DRA Articles
Read more
RICHMOND, Va. --Kemba Smith Pradia's voting rights have been restored. More than a decade after she served a federal prison sentence for drug-related offenses — and was granted clemency in 2000 by President Bill Clinton — the Norfolk resident received word Thursday that her civil rights had been restored in Virginia, clearing the path for her to vote for the first time here. Pradia learned of her restoration the day before a news conference in Richmond with NAACP President and CEO Benjamin Todd Jealous...
Olympia Meola | Richmond Times Dispatch 09 Oct 2012 Hits:745 VS-DRA Articles
Read more
The Government Accountability Office released a new report Thursday confirming millions of Americans have been disenfranchised by voter suppression laws in up to 31 states, signalling a "major shift" over the past tens years towards the limiting of rights of eligible voters to cast their ballots. The study, which was requested by Senators Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), Richard Durbin (D-Ill.) and Bill Nelson (D-Fla.), shows in the past ten years, 21 states passed new voter ID laws, seven states tightened existing ID requirements,...
Common Dreams Staff | Common Dreams 05 Oct 2012 Hits:717 VS-DRA Articles
Read more
Another disturbing revelation from the still-expanding nationwide GOP Voter Registration Fraud Scandal... From Palm Beach to Richmond, from Las Vegas to Portland, it's not a coincidence, it's a coordinated GOP scheme intended to keep Obama supporters from signing up to vote. While a major element of the Republican National Committee's strategy to game the 2012 elections by affecting who gets to vote and who does not has been cut off at the knees in the wake of a criminal election fraud complaint and other late developments in the...
Brad Friedman | Brad Blog 04 Oct 2012 Hits:851 VS-DRA Articles
Read more
This election year voting rights laws have turned into a heated issue as civil rights groups and state legislatures fight over photo ID requirements. While that issue has received a lot of attention, the larger problem of felon disenfranchisement laws has attracted less concern despite the potential millions of votes at stake. According to the nonprofit organization VOTE, individuals in Tennessee who have been convicted of a felony are ineligible to vote while incarcerated, on parole, or on probation. Those people convicted since 1981- except for some felonies such as murder,...
Lee Davis | The Chattanoogan 30 Sep 2012 Hits:686 VS-DRA Articles
Read moreA lower court judge appears to be seeking a compromise for the presidential election. Voting rights activists may be close to winning one of the year’s biggest voter ID fights. The Pennsylvania…
There are all sorts of scenarios for how the GOP might steal the 2012 election, but this much is certain: that becomes much harder to do if there is…
As Pennsylvania’s strict voter ID law returns to the lower court for reconsideration, its original sponsor, Rep. Daryl Metcalfe (R-PA), told KDKA Radio Wednesday morning that his law …
Voter purges and ID requirements being enacted in over 20 states could disenfranchise at least 10 million Hispanic citizens. A new study by the Advancement Project estimatesthat voter purges and ID…
Deidra Reese isn't waiting for people to come to her to find out whether they are registered to vote. With iPad in hand, Reese is going to community centers, homes and…
Ohio – Secretary of State Jon Husted (R) dominated the news in the last two weeks. First, a federal judge restored early voting days for the weekend before the election.…
Republicans across the United States have passed a spate of voter suppression laws aimed at those most likely to vote for Obama. They are specifically targeting African American women who,…
On Sunday I attended a fascinating panel of Southern politics experts convened by UNC–Chapel Hill. One of the major takeaways from the session was how diverse the South has…
There was mixed news on the voting war front in three swing states on Friday--Florida, Ohio, Pennsylvania--although it is too early to tell how it will affect voters…
![]() |
![]() |
| Andrea Miller - VA | Rev. Terence Dicks - GA |
Edit your profile to Join or Leave an Issue Team. If you receive emails from PDA, you already have an account on the PDA Salsa database. If this is your first time logging into Salsa, enter your email address and click Send Password. When you get your temporary password you will be able to login. Groups and Issue Teams are listed at the bottom of the page. Check any Issue Teams you wish to join and click the Join button at the botton of the page. Click Remove Membership from any team you wish to Leave.
| Mon May 27, 2013 @ 9:00PM - 10:00PM PDA ERA 3 State Strategy Call (559) 726-1300; Access Code: 787085# |
| Tue May 28, 2013 @ 9:00PM - 10:00PM Clean, Fair, Transparent Elections IOT Call (559) 726-1300; Access Code: 314363# |
| Wed Jun 05, 2013 @ 9:00PM - 10:00PM Economic and Social Justice Issue Team Call (559) 726-1300; Access Code: 781761# |
| Mon Jun 10, 2013 @ 8:30PM - 09:30PM End Mass Criminalizations IOT Call (559) 726-1300; Access Code: 331473# |
| Tue Jun 11, 2013 @ 9:00PM - 10:00PM End Wars and Occupations Issue Team Call (559) 726-1300; Access Code: 952870# |
| Tue Jun 18, 2013 @ 9:00PM - 10:00PM Healthcare for All Issue Team Call (559) 726-1300; Access Code: 733525# |
| Wed Jun 19, 2013 @ 9:00PM - 10:00PM Stop Global Warming Issue Team Call (559) 726-1300; Access Code: 661274# |
| Mon Jun 24, 2013 @ 9:00PM - 10:00PM PDA ERA 3 State Strategy Call (559) 726-1300; Access Code: 787085# |
| Tue Jun 25, 2013 @ 9:00PM - 10:00PM Clean, Fair, Transparent Elections IOT Call (559) 726-1300; Access Code: 314363# |
| Wed Jun 26, 2013 @ 9:00PM - 10:00PM End Corporate Rule IOT Call (559) 726-1300; Access Code: 754227# |
PDA is organized around several core issues. These issues include:
Each team hosts a monthly conference call. Calls feature legislators, staffers and other policy experts. On these calls we determine PDA legislation to support as well as actions and future events.