Issues Stop Voter Suppression The Democracy Restoration Act: Creating A Broader and More Just Base of Voter Participation

Jessica Chiappone just wants to set an example for her two young sons by helping troubled families like the one she grew up in.

As a young Florida resident, she was convicted of a nonviolent drug offense. But since serving her prison sentence, she has turned her life around. Jessica successfully completed law school and is now a hardworking single mom who hopes to someday become a public defender.

But despite her efforts to make up for her past, Jessica was barred from voting because of her felony conviction. Under Florida law, she is unable to vote, hold public office or sit on a jury – all requirements for admission to the Florida Bar. And the prospects for having her civil rights restored, on which her new career depends, dimmed this year when Florida authorities significantly toughened the state’s rules around felon re-enfranchisement, eliminating a streamlined process for non-violent offenders to regain rights, and imposing new waiting periods and hearing procedures.

Florida is not the only state with these tough rules. Virginia, Iowa and Kentucky permanently disfranchise citizens with felony convictions unless the state individually approves the citizen’s restoration of rights. And while two states, Maine and Vermont, allow all persons with convictions to vote, even while incarcerated, the majority of state laws fall somewhere in between these two models. Moreover, because each state has its own set of rules, there has been widespread confusion about the proper administration of state laws that has contributed to the disfranchisement of even eligible citizens.

But today there is hope for Jessica and the nearly 4 million other American citizens who have also been released from prison and are living and working in their communities, but are still denied their right to vote in federal elections.

Today, Sen. Ben Cardin (D-Md.) introduced a critical bill that would fix this problem by establishing a uniform standard for voting in federal elections. The Democracy Restoration Act, S. 2017 (DRA) would eliminate the confusion caused by the current patchwork of state laws; streamline election administration; ensure that probationers never lose their right to vote in federal elections; and notify people about their right to vote in federal elections when they are leaving prison, sentenced to probation or convicted of a misdemeanor.

The DRA is also championed by Rep. John Conyers (D-Mich.) in the House of Representatives and supported by a very broad range of organizations in the faith, law enforcement, and civil rights communities.

Until recently, the state trend of easing criminal disfranchisement laws was generally moving forward with bipartisan support. Between 1997 and 2009, 16 Republican governors in 12 states approved policies that relaxed voting prohibitions applicable to people with criminal records.

But in the 2011 legislative season, we saw a variety of voting restrictions introduced in more than 30 states, and 16 states advanced measures that would create more barriers to voting, including a rollback of enfranchisement rights in Florida and Iowa. The DRA is particularly important in the wake of these voter suppression laws, which Attorney General Eric Holder warned are taking us back in time to a darker era in the history of voting rights.

Many felony disfranchisement laws have their roots in the Jim Crow era and were intended to bar minorities from voting. The impact of these laws continues today. Due to criminal disfranchisement laws, 13 percent of African-American men have lost the right to vote — a rate seven times the national average. Latino citizens are also disproportionately disfranchised because they are over-represented in the criminal justice system. In turn, this has impacted the families and communities of those who are disfranchised by reducing their collective political voice.

The DRA would strengthen our democracy by creating a broader and more just base of voter participation. No citizen should be denied their right to vote due to a past criminal conviction. By continuing to deny Americans the right to vote based on a past criminal conviction, the government is endorsing a system that expects these citizens to contribute to the community, but denies them participation in our democracy.

Jessica Chiappone, and millions of others, have earned a second chance and deserve more.

Tell Congress to act now to restore one of our most fundamental rights by supporting the Democracy Restoration Act.

Link to original article from ACLU Blog

Learn more about voting rights: Sign up for breaking news alerts, follow us on Twitter, and like us on Facebook.


blog comments powered by Disqus

End Mass Criminalization - EMC Articles

IOT-Voter Suppression/DRA Articles

Prev Next Page:

Governor Signs Photo ID Bill

Governor Signs Photo ID Bill

Richmond, VA-  Concerning the Governor’s actions related to voter ID legislation, SB 1256, the following statement can be attributed to Claire Guthrie Gastañaga, ACLU of Virginia Executive Director: The ACLU of Virginia is extremely disappointed that Governor Bob McDonnell has chosen to sign legislation requiring photo ID at the polls for all voters.  There is no evidence of need for such legislation, particularly after the Commonwealth enacted an enhanced ID requirement last year. There is not one case of voter impersonation fraud in Virginia, the only voter fraud that photo ID...

ACLU Virginia 28 Mar 2013 Hits:370 VS-DRA Articles

Read more

U.S. Supreme Court Considers ALEC Voter Registration Bill And Limiting Federal Oversight o…

U.S. Supreme Court Considers ALEC Voter Registration Bill And Limiting Federal Oversight of Eligible Voters

Arizona imposed stricter voter registration requirements. But the GOP doesn't want to stop there. The U.S. Supreme Court is hearing oral arguments today to decide whether an Arizona statute that imposes restrictions on voter registration conflicts with federal law. The case could potentially decide the balance between the state and federal governments when it comes to elections and voting rights. After becoming law in Arizona, the bill at issue was adopted as a "model" by the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC). The case, Arizona v. Inter Tribal Council of Arizona, arises in...

Brendan Fisher | PR Watch 23 Mar 2013 Hits:895 VS-DRA Articles

Read more

Time for a 'Right to Vote' Constitutional Amendment

Time for a 'Right to Vote' Constitutional Amendment

President Obama earned one of the loudest rounds of applause during his fourth State of the Union address when he declared, “We ...

Ari Berman | The Nation 11 Mar 2013 Hits:542 VS-DRA Articles

Read more

In Supreme Court Debate on Voting Rights Act, a Dubious Use of Statistics

In Supreme Court Debate on Voting Rights Act, a Dubious Use of Statistics

In oral arguments before the Supreme Court last week, Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. introduced a statistical claim that he took to imply that an important provision of the Voting Rights Act has become outmoded. Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act, which is being challenged by Shelby County, Ala., in the case before the court, requires that certain states, counties and townships with a history of racial discrimination get approval (or “pre-clearance”) from the Department of Justice before making changes to their voting laws. But Chief Justice Roberts said...

Nate Silver | The New York Times 10 Mar 2013 Hits:353 VS-DRA Articles

Read more

What Happens If The Voting Rights Act Loses In The Supreme Court

What Happens If The Voting Rights Act Loses In The Supreme Court

We do not have to guess what the states currently subject to a key provision of the Voting Rights Act will do if the Supreme Court grants their wish to have that provision declared unconstitutional — top Republicans in those states have already told us. In a brief filed last August, Republican attorneys general from six of the states covered, at least in part, by Section 5 of the Voting Right Act complained that this landmark legislation is all that stands between them and implementing a common methos of disenfranchising minority...

Ian Millhiser | Think Progress 03 Mar 2013 Hits:551 VS-DRA Articles

Read more

Supreme Court Poised to Declare Racism Over

Supreme Court Poised to Declare Racism Over

Pop champagne: Racism is over. "There is an old disease, and that disease is cured," Bert Rein, the attorney leading the legal challenge to the Voting Rights Act—the landmark law intended to ensure all Americans can vote—told to the Supreme Court on Tuesday. "That problem is solved." Rein represents Shelby County, Alabama, one of the jurisdictions covered by a key section of the Voting Rights Act called Section 5. Under Section 5, parts of the country with histories of discriminatory election practices have to ask for permission—or "preclearance," in legal terms—from the Justice...

Adam Serwer | Mother Jones 03 Mar 2013 Hits:404 VS-DRA Articles

Read more

Why the Predictions Could be Wrong in Shelby County

Why the Predictions Could be Wrong in Shelby County

If you listen to the court watchers reacting to Wednesday’s oral arguments in Shelby County v. Holder, you might be bracing yourself for a roll back of voting rights. They are largely predicting the formula used to determine which states and localities are subject to or “covered” by the preclearance provision of the Voting Rights Act (VRA) will be struck down by the Supreme Court. This isn’t the first time we’ve heard these prognostications. In 2009, similar predictions abounded in a similar case, Northwest Austin Municipal Utility...

Myrna Pérez | Brennan Center for Justice 01 Mar 2013 Hits:405 VS-DRA Articles

Read more

Don't Gut the Voting Rights Act

Don't Gut the Voting Rights Act

On Wednesday, the U.S. Supreme Court will review the Voting Rights Act of 1965In Shelby County v. Holder, the Court will hear arguments on Section 5 -- the heart of the Voting Rights Act -- that allows the federal government to block state election practices that are discriminatory. A predominantly white county in Alabama, Shelby County, charges that the decision of Congress in 2006 to reauthorize Section 5 is unconstitutional. The case comes on the heels of a federal election last fall in which our nation witnessed the...

Penda D. Hair and Benjamin Todd Jealous | Common Dreams 26 Feb 2013 Hits:454 VS-DRA Articles

Read more

A Good Start on Voting Reform, But Let's Get On With It

A Good Start on Voting Reform, But Let's Get On With It

President Obama made a good start in his State of the Union speech at honoring his election night promise to fix the breakdowns that left tens of thousands of Americans standing in hours-long lines at the polls last November. His moving introduction of 102-year-old Desiline Victor, who had to wait for six hours at a North Miami precinct to cast her ballot, humanized the threat to democracy posed by the rickety machinery of our elections. And in creating a Commission on Election Administration and tapping a...

Bob Edgar | Huffington Post 14 Feb 2013 Hits:307 VS-DRA Articles

Read more

Why Are Conservatives Trying to Destroy the Voting Rights Act?

Why Are Conservatives Trying to Destroy the Voting Rights Act?

In 2006, Congress voted overwhelmingly to reauthorize key provisions of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 for another twenty-five years. The legislation passed 390–33 in the House and 98–0 in the Senate. Every top Republican supported the bill. “The Voting Rights Act must continue to exist,” said House Judiciary chair James Sensenbrenner, a conservative Republican, “and exist in its current form.” Civil rights leaders flanked George W. Bush at the signing ceremony. Seven years later, the bipartisan consensus that supported the VRA for nearly fifty years has collapsed, and conservatives are...

Ari Berman | The Nation 08 Feb 2013 Hits:435 VS-DRA Articles

Read more

Bolling breaks tie, Senate backs photo ID for voters

Relying again on the tie-breaking vote of Lt. Gov. Bill Bolling, Republicans in the evenly divided Virginia Senate on Tuesday narrowly passed a bill that would require nearly all voters to present a form of photo identification in order to cast a ballot. Final approval of Senate Bill 1256, sponsored by Sen. Mark D. Obenshain, R-Harrisonburg, is contingent upon funding the estimated cost of providing free photos to registered voters who do not have an accepted form of photo ID. A similar bill died in...

Jim Nolan | Richmond Times Dispatch 06 Feb 2013 Hits:448 VS-DRA Articles

Read more

Spotlight on Ohio: Steps to Cure Disenfranchisement by Typo

Spotlight on Ohio: Steps to Cure Disenfranchisement by Typo

In the run up to the 2012 election (as in every presidential election since at least 2004), Ohio was again at the center of controversy. On early voting, provisional ballots, and more, the Ohio Secretary of State’s office took positions that we strenuously opposed because they would make it more difficult for Ohioans to cast ballots that would be counted. But this post isn’t about those controversies.  It’s about an important step taken by the Ohio Secretary of State’s Office to ensure the ballots of...

Vishal Agraharkar | Brennan Center for Justice 31 Jan 2013 Hits:361 VS-DRA Articles

Read more

VA Attorney general rivals offer bills to require photo ID to vote

VA Attorney general rivals offer bills to require photo ID to vote

Republicans Obenshain, Bell, candidates for attorney general, put forth proposals. A year after controversial voter identification legislation passed the Virginia General Assembly, several Republican lawmakers are proposing even greater restrictions on the identification required to cast a ballot, including the requirement of photo identification. Del. Robert B. Bell, R-Albemarle, will introduce what he terms “Photo ID — No Exceptions,” a measure that would require voters to present valid government-issued photo identification in order to vote. Acquiring the identification would also require proof of U.S. ...

Jim Nolan | Richmond Times Dispatch 08 Jan 2013 Hits:410 VS-DRA Articles

Read more

Are Voter ID Laws Here to Stay?

Are Voter ID Laws Here to Stay?

Voter ID laws were one of the most contentious issues of the past election season. (Here is everything you need to know about the laws.) Proponents insisted IDs should be required at polling places in order to thwart fraud. But there has been little evidence of such fraud and Democrats argued that the laws were meant to suppress voters. The impact of the laws on this past election isn't clear. But one thing is clear: There are still pushes for the laws in many states. So what happens next? We've rounded up the...

Suevon Lee | Pro Publica 28 Dec 2012 Hits:404 VS-DRA Articles

Read more

Jim Crow goes to the polls

Jim Crow goes to the polls

Number of states where Republican lawmakers passed new voting restrictions in the run-up to this year's election that critics said would suppress the youth, African-American and Hispanic vote: more than 12 Number of days by which Florida's Republican lawmakers reduced the state's 14-day early voting period amid concerns over strong Democratic turnout in 2008: 6 As a consequence, hours that Juanita Morales of Miami-Dade County, Fla. waited in line to cast a ballot during early voting while tethered to an oxygen tank: more than 4 Wait that...

Sue Sturgis | Facing South 15 Nov 2012 Hits:493 VS-DRA Articles

Read more

Campaigns Brace to Sue for Votes in Crucial States

Campaigns Brace to Sue for Votes in Crucial States

CLEVELAND — Thousands of lawyers from both presidential campaigns will enter polling places next Tuesday with one central goal: tracking their opponents and, if need be, initiating legal action. It will be a kind of Spy vs. Spy. The lawyers will note how poll workers behave, where voters are directed, if intimidation appears to be occurring, whether lines are long. And they will report up a chain of command where decisions over court action will be made at headquarters in Chicago and Boston. This will go...

Ethan Bronner | New York Times 02 Nov 2012 Hits:561 VS-DRA Articles

Read more

Why Progressives Are Still Worried About Voter Suppression

Why Progressives Are Still Worried About Voter Suppression

Voter ID measures have mostly been blocked. But there are plenty of other hijinks that have liberals on edge for Election Day. A few months ago, Democrats were convinced that voter ID laws were Republicans' secret plan to steal the election. But as Election Day nears, these and other allegedly suppressive efforts -- from Florida's attempt to purge voter rolls to Ohio's move to restrict early voting to Pennsylvania's strict voter ID law -- have mostly fizzled, thanks largely to legal challenges from the Justice Department,...

Molly Ball | The Atlantic 01 Nov 2012 Hits:681 VS-DRA Articles

Read more

Suppression Surges as Election Nears

Suppression Surges as Election Nears

With a little more than a week before Election Day, grassroots campaigns are hoping to  maximize voter participation among often disenfranchised communities. Cuéntame has launched a series of public service announcements targeted at some 50,000 new Latino voters in three swing states: Colorado, Nevada, and Florida. The PSAs, made in conjunction with 300 partner groups, are airing on major Spanish language television stations like Univision, MundoFox, and Azteca America. But it’s not all good news. Our community journalists write in that schemes...

Aura Bogado | Colorlines 26 Oct 2012 Hits:927 VS-DRA Articles

Read more

UN to Monitor GOP Voter Suppression at Polls

UN to Monitor GOP Voter Suppression at Polls

It may be less than 150 monitors and observers, but a UN affiliated organization (the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE)) will be in the US on Election Day to report on any perceived irregularities. According to The Hill, the delegation is coming at the request of US Civil Rights groups concerned about the massive national effort by the Republican Party to keep non-GOP voting groups from casting ballots: Civil rights groups met with representatives from the OSCE this week to raise their fears about what they say...

Mark Karlin | Buzzflash 22 Oct 2012 Hits:1081 VS-DRA Articles

Read more

The Voter Fraud Myth

The Voter Fraud Myth

Teresa Sharp is fifty-three years old and has lived in a modest single-family house on Millsdale Street, in a suburb of Cincinnati, for nearly thirty-three years. A lifelong Democrat, she has voted in every Presidential election since she turned eighteen. So she was agitated when an official summons from the Hamilton County Board of Elections arrived in the mail last month. Hamilton County, which includes Cincinnati, is one of the most populous regions of the most fiercely contested state in the 2012 election....

Jane Mayer | The New Yorker 22 Oct 2012 Hits:1014 VS-DRA Articles

Read more

'RNC Official' Arrested for Trashing Voter Registrations in VA Worked for Romney Consultan…

'RNC Official' Arrested for Trashing Voter Registrations in VA Worked for Romney Consultant, 'Fired' GOP Operative Nathan Sproul GOP Voter Registration Scandal Widens, Prosecutors File Criminal Charges

A man originally reported to have been working for the Republican Party of Virginia was arrested by the Rockingham County, Va., Sheriff’s Office on Thursday and charged with attempting to destroy voter registration forms by tossing them into a dumpster behind a shopping center in Harrisonburg, Va. “Prosecutors charged him with four counts of destruction of voter registration applications, eight counts of failing to disclose voter registration applications and one count of obstruction of justice,” according to a report late Thursday afternoon from TPM’s Ryan Reilly....

Brad Friedman | The Brad Blog 21 Oct 2012 Hits:1458 VS-DRA Articles

Read more

Democracy in 'Suspense': Why Arizona's Native Voters Are in Peril

Democracy in 'Suspense': Why Arizona's Native Voters Are in Peril

Arizona’s Apache County is obscuring the collective power of the Native vote in an unprecedented way. The County, which has previously violated the Voting Rights Act, has inaccurately placed more than 500 people who attempted to register on a list that could permanently purge these would-be voters from the rolls. And most, if not all, of those affected are Navajo. Naomi White wanted to vote in Arizona’s primary in August, and wants to vote on Election Day in November. White had previously voted in Utah,...

Aura Bogado | The Nation 20 Oct 2012 Hits:728 VS-DRA Articles

Read more

South Carolina Voter ID Not in Effect for 2012, Law Weakened for Future Elections

Washington, D.C. – South Carolina voters will not need to show a photo ID to vote in this year’s election, a federal court ruled Wednesday, the latest in a series of legal victories against restrictive voting laws. The court ruled there was not enough time left to implement the law for 2012. It will be in effect for future elections, but the court clarified aspects of the law so that it “does not require a photo ID to vote.” Instead, South Carolinians can continue to use their non-photo ...

Brennan Center for Justice 18 Oct 2012 Hits:683 VS-DRA Articles

Read more

Former Republican: How I Learned That Voter ID Laws Pushed By the GOP Are Racist

Former Republican: How I Learned That Voter ID Laws Pushed By the GOP Are Racist

Democrats are frustrated: Why can’t Republican voters see that Republicans pass voter ID laws to suppress voting, not fraud? Democrats know who tends to lack ID.  They know that the threat of in-person voter fraud is wildly exaggerated.  Besides, Republican officials could hardly have been clearer about the real purpose behind these laws and courts keep striking them down as unconstitutional.  Still, Republican support remains sky high, with only one third of Republicans recognizing that they are primarily intended to boost the GOP's prospects. How can Republican voters go on believing that the...

Jeremiah Goulka | TomDispatch 15 Oct 2012 Hits:998 VS-DRA Articles

Read more

Advocate: New Constitutional Amendment Needed to Protect the Right to Vote

Advocate: New Constitutional Amendment Needed to Protect the Right to Vote

The struggle over state-sponsored legislation limiting or redefining how and when citizens can vote has generated contentious debate. Judith Browne Dianis, Co-Director of Advancement Project, a non-partisan organization dedicated to civil rights and racial justice, has been a vocal opponent of state photo-ID laws and other restrictive measures. In an interview with New America Media’s Khalil Abdullah, Browne Dianis explains why she has concluded a new amendment on the right to vote to the U.S. Constitution is necessary.New America Media: Why do...

Khalil Abdullah, New America Media | Interview 14 Oct 2012 Hits:575 VS-DRA Articles

Read more

Court clears South Carolina voter ID law for 2013

Court clears South Carolina voter ID law for 2013

(Reuters) - A new South Carolina law that generally requires voters to show photo identification does not discriminate against racial minorities but cannot go into effect until the start of next year, a federal court ruled on Wednesday. The U.S. District Court three-judge panel said too little time remains before the November 6 general election for state officials to implement the law this year. The decision was unanimous. Republican governors and state lawmakers across the country have renewed the push for photo-identification requirements...

David Ingram | Reuters 10 Oct 2012 Hits:640 VS-DRA Articles

Read more

NAACP brings voter rights effort to Richmond

NAACP brings voter rights effort to Richmond

RICHMOND, Va. --Kemba Smith Pradia's voting rights have been restored. More than a decade after she served a federal prison sentence for drug-related offenses — and was granted clemency in 2000 by President Bill Clinton — the Norfolk resident received word Thursday that her civil rights had been restored in Virginia, clearing the path for her to vote for the first time here. Pradia learned of her restoration the day before a news conference in Richmond with NAACP President and CEO Benjamin Todd Jealous...

Olympia Meola | Richmond Times Dispatch 09 Oct 2012 Hits:738 VS-DRA Articles

Read more

'Alarming Number' of New State Laws Making it 'Significantly Harder' to Vote: Senators, GA…

'Alarming Number' of New State Laws Making it 'Significantly Harder' to Vote: Senators, GAO Report

The Government Accountability Office released a new report Thursday confirming millions of Americans have been disenfranchised by voter suppression laws in up to 31 states, signalling a "major shift" over the past tens years towards the limiting of rights of eligible voters to cast their ballots. The study, which was requested by Senators Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), Richard Durbin (D-Ill.) and Bill Nelson (D-Fla.), shows in the past ten years, 21 states passed new voter ID laws, seven states tightened existing ID requirements,...

Common Dreams Staff | Common Dreams 05 Oct 2012 Hits:709 VS-DRA Articles

Read more

National Republican Voter Registration Strategy Includes Lying to Potential Voters About '…

National Republican Voter Registration Strategy Includes Lying to Potential Voters About 'Taking a Poll' in Order to Screen Out Obama Supporters

Another disturbing revelation from the still-expanding nationwide GOP Voter Registration Fraud Scandal... From Palm Beach to Richmond, from Las Vegas to Portland, it's not a coincidence, it's a coordinated GOP scheme intended to keep Obama supporters from signing up to vote. While a major element of the Republican National Committee's strategy to game the 2012 elections by affecting who gets to vote and who does not has been cut off at the knees in the wake of a criminal election fraud complaint and other late developments in the...

Brad Friedman | Brad Blog 04 Oct 2012 Hits:844 VS-DRA Articles

Read more

Study Highlights Harm Done By Felon Disenfranchisement Laws

Study Highlights Harm Done By Felon Disenfranchisement Laws

This election year voting rights laws have turned into a heated issue as civil rights groups and state legislatures fight over photo ID requirements. While that issue has received a lot of attention, the larger problem of felon disenfranchisement laws has attracted less concern despite the potential millions of votes at stake. According to the nonprofit organization VOTE, individuals in Tennessee who have been convicted of a felony are ineligible to vote while incarcerated, on parole, or on probation. Those people convicted since 1981- except for some felonies such as murder,...

Lee Davis | The Chattanoogan 30 Sep 2012 Hits:678 VS-DRA Articles

Read more

Team Leaders - Stop Voter Suppression

andrea250 terence2
Andrea Miller - VA Rev. Terence Dicks - GA

 


Join/Change Issue Team

Edit your profile to Join or Leave an Issue Team. If you receive emails from PDA, you already have an account on the PDA Salsa database. If this is your first time logging into Salsa, enter your email address and click Send Password. When you get your temporary password you will be able to login. Groups and Issue Teams are listed at the bottom of the page. Check any Issue Teams you wish to join and click the Join button at the botton of the page. Click Remove Membership from any team you wish to Leave.

Join/Change your Issue Team

Issue Team Calls

Tue May 21, 2013 @ 9:00PM - 10:00PM
Healthcare for All Issue Team Call
(559) 726-1300; Access Code: 733525#
Wed May 22, 2013 @ 9:00PM - 10:00PM
End Corporate Rule IOT Call
(559) 726-1300; Access Code: 754227#
Mon May 27, 2013 @ 9:00PM - 10:00PM
PDA ERA 3 State Strategy Call
(559) 726-1300; Access Code: 787085#
Tue May 28, 2013 @ 9:00PM - 10:00PM
Clean, Fair, Transparent Elections IOT Call
(559) 726-1300; Access Code: 314363#
Wed Jun 05, 2013 @ 9:00PM - 10:00PM
Economic and Social Justice Issue Team Call
(559) 726-1300; Access Code: 781761#
Mon Jun 10, 2013 @ 8:30PM - 09:30PM
End Mass Criminalizations IOT Call
(559) 726-1300; Access Code: 331473#
Tue Jun 11, 2013 @ 9:00PM - 10:00PM
End Wars and Occupations Issue Team Call
(559) 726-1300; Access Code: 952870#
Tue Jun 18, 2013 @ 9:00PM - 10:00PM
Healthcare for All Issue Team Call
(559) 726-1300; Access Code: 733525#
Wed Jun 19, 2013 @ 9:00PM - 10:00PM
Stop Global Warming Issue Team Call
(559) 726-1300; Access Code: 661274#
Mon Jun 24, 2013 @ 9:00PM - 10:00PM
PDA ERA 3 State Strategy Call
(559) 726-1300; Access Code: 787085#

PDA Issues

PDA is organized around several core issues. These issues include:

Each team hosts a monthly conference call. Calls feature legislators, staffers and other policy experts. On these calls we determine PDA legislation to support as well as actions and future events.


Subscribe to Democracy Restoration Act
View this group
Find us on Facebook

PR Rank