South Dakota

People Demanding Action Radio Network

Banner
SD

SD-InformedConsentInformed consent is one of the cornerstones of health-care law and its basic principles have been well-established for decades. Informed consent law reflects the fundamental notion that every competent adult has a right to make the ultimate decisions about her healthcare that will affect her life prospects. A single driving goal animates informed consent law—respect for patient autonomy. Informed consent law preserves patient autonomy by protecting the patient’s bodily integrity and self-determination.

Canterbury v. Spence, a leading case on informed consent, set forth the key principle that “it is the prerogative of the patient” to decide “the direction in which his interests seem to lie.” Thus, the doctrine of informed consent compels the disclosure of accurate medical information consistent with the expert knowledge of the medical community.

This rule ensures that patients receive sufficient information to make their own decisions about whether to consent to medical treatment. Informed consent law’s long-established principles have been perverted in the context of abortion legislation. Anti-choice laws claiming to ensure well-informed decisions for women in fact misuse informed consent terminology to further goals antithetical to the imperatives animating informed consent law.

In an en banc opinion, the Eighth Circuit recently upheld South Dakota’s mandate that physicians inform women seeking abortion care that “an increased risk of suicide ideation and suicide” is a known risk of the abortion procedure. Responding to the Eighth Circuit’s holding, South Dakota Attorney General Marty Jackley declared, “Today’s decision supports the Legislature’s goal of encouraging women seeking an abortion to make informed and voluntary decisions.” Although this statement invokes notions of patient autonomy, South Dakota’s abortion law actually turns on its head informed consent law’s respect for patient self-determination through the provision of accurate, relevant information. As Jennifer Keighley has summarized, South Dakota’s claims about abortion and suicide risk are scientifically dubious. While Planned Parenthood v. Casey permitted abortion-specific informed consent laws, it emphasized that only “truthful, nonmisleading” information would be constitutionally permissible.  But the weight of medical evidence indicates that South Dakota’s legislation is untruthful and misleading.  The Eighth Circuit’s decision to uphold medically-inaccurate information is not surprising, however, given that a similarly ideologically divided court previously upheld South Dakota’s requirement that physicians inform abortion patients “that the abortion will terminate the life of a whole, separate, unique, living human being”—hardly the unbiased information demanded by informed consent doctrine.

South Dakota is not alone in its misuse of traditional medical principles in regulating abortion care. State abortion laws are rife with mis-information and shaming rituals masquerading as protections of a “woman’s right to know.” For example, efforts to mandate clinically unnecessary ultrasounds have also been enacted under the guise of protecting abortion patients’ right to information, even though mandatory ultrasounds impose a medical procedure in violation of a patient’s right to refuse treatment protected by informed consent law.

These abortion regulations belie a deep suspicion of women as medical (and moral) decision-makers. Their proponents claim to follow the general principle of protecting patients’ interests in informed decision-making, but they seek to apply that principle differently to women seeking abortion care. South Dakota’s legislation and other similar anti-choice “informed consent” laws aim not at preserving women’s autonomy, but at imposing the government’s normative views about what decisions women should make.

Numerous anti-choice laws—like South Dakota’s—exploit informed consent doctrine to further goals antithetical to the notion of autonomy that these laws pretend to promote.  South Dakota’s disingenuous assertions about protecting women’s well-being by mandating mis-information mask its true purpose—to thwart access to abortion and discourage women from seeking abortion care. South Dakota thus ignores the lesson learned long ago within the law of informed consent—that the patient should have the prerogative to determine for herself where her best interests lie.

Link to original article from RH Reality Check

Add a comment

States - South Dakota

Page 3 of 10

3

South Dakota News

Prev Next Page:

Rapid City, S.D.: The City Without Separation of Church and State

Rapid City, S.D.: The City Without Separation of Church and State

Despite scrutiny, city officials are vowing not to remove Christian prayer at City Council meetings. In South Dakota, city government officials are doubling down on their unconstitutional practice of beginning each city council meeting with a Christian prayer--despite objections from residents and the threat of a lawsuit. The battle began earlier this year in Rapid City, South Dakota, when a teenage atheist who attends the city council meetings complained about the mandatory moment of prayer that opens each gathering. But instead of reconsidering the council’s ...

Laura Gottesdiener | AlterNet 23 Feb 2013 Hits:886 South Dakota

Read more

For Sale: The Sacred Center of the Sioux Universe

For Sale: The Sacred Center of the Sioux Universe

Editor's note: Pe' Sla sits on 1,942 acres of land in the Black Hills of South Dakota. It is sacred to the Lakota, Dakota, and Nakota Sioux people, who consider it the center of the world. At 10:00 in the morning on August 25, Pe' Sla is scheduled to be auctioned off to the highest bidder. If this happens, these indigenous groups may lose access to their sacred land and conventional development (think ranches and roads) is likely to begin. The Sioux are now working to...

Winona LaDuke 03 Sep 2012 Hits:619 South Dakota

Read more

Perverting Informed Consent: The South Dakota Court Decision

Perverting Informed Consent: The South Dakota Court Decision

Informed consent is one of the cornerstones of health-care law and its basic principles have been well-established for decades. Informed consent law reflects the fundamental notion that every competent adult has a right to make the ultimate decisions about her healthcare that will affect her life prospects. A single driving goal animates informed consent law—respect for patient autonomy. Informed consent law preserves patient autonomy by protecting the patient’s bodily integrity and self-determination. Canterbury v. Spence, a leading case on informed consent, set forth...

Maya Manian | RH Reality Check 04 Aug 2012 Hits:538 South Dakota

Read more

Senate Banking Chair Calls Jamie Dimon to Testify: But JP Morgan Chase is His Biggest Cont…

Senate Banking Chair Calls Jamie Dimon to Testify: But JP Morgan Chase is His Biggest Contributor!

Jamie Dimon Sen. Tim Johnson (SD) Holding your breath about the fallout from J. P. Morgan Chase’s derivatives losses? Yesterday, if you believed Politico, you could exhale. Senate Banking Committee Chair Tim Johnson of South Dakota announced his panel would call JP Morgan Chase Chair Jamie Dimon to testify. It’s good that the watchdog is barking, but we’d all better watch closely to see if it will bite. Here’s what Politico didn’t tell you. Political Money Line’s tabulations of PAC contributions show that securities and...

Thomas Ferguson | Sourced from AlterNet 20 May 2012 Hits:723 South Dakota

Read more

SD Legislature a stronghold for ALEC membership

SD Legislature a stronghold for ALEC membership

The national campaign to politically discredit the American Legislative Exchange Council and the many businesses that financially support ALEC hasn’t swept into South Dakota yet, despite our Legislature being such a stronghold for lawmakers who are ALEC members. The shooting death of Trayvon Martin in Florida is fueling the current backlash against ALEC for its role in promoting legislation known as a “stand your ground” law. A special Internet site alecexposed.org sprung up to show the broad range of legislation that ALEC through its ...

Bob Mercer | The Daily Republic 15 Apr 2012 Hits:731 South Dakota

Read more

Lakota Indians Block ‘Keystone XL Pipeline’ Trucks in Six-Hour Standoff

Lakota Indians Block ‘Keystone XL Pipeline’ Trucks in Six-Hour Standoff

  Five Lakotas on Pine Ridge Indian land in South Dakota were arrested Monday after attempting to block two tarsands pipeline trucks from entering their land. According to the Lakota activist the six-hour standoff started when the trucks refused to turn around claiming they had “corporate rights that supersede any other law.” According to the Rapid City Journal “several dozens” of American Indians were part of the blockade but a community journalist reports only five people were arrested.   An action alert made it’s way throughout the reservation on...

Jorge Rivas | ColorLines 07 Mar 2012 Hits:1241 South Dakota

Read more

South Dakota weighs ban on public sector collective bargaining

South Dakota weighs ban on public sector collective bargaining

South Dakota is considering a Wisconsin-style ban on public sector collective bargaining at all levels of government. But because many public workers have limited or nonexistent bargaining rights to begin with, the debate is causing considerable confusion. South Dakota is a “right-to-work” state, meaning that employees cannot be compelled to pay union fees as a condition of their employment even if they work in a unionized environment. Only 5.1 percent of workers in South Dakota belong to a union. Binding arbitration and...

Melissa Maynard | Stateline 09 Feb 2012 Hits:613 South Dakota

Read more

SD Indians Sue for Early Voting

SD Indians Sue for Early Voting

Native Americans have never had an easy time getting to vote in South Dakota. In 1977, the state attorney general dismissed the Voting Rights Act as an “absurdity” and advised state officials to ignore the federal law. The state didn’t allow Native Americans into polling places until the 1940s, though federal law had given them the right to vote in 1924. In 2004, a judge stopped poll watchers from following Native Americans out of voting places and taking down their license-plate numbers. Through the years,...

Stephanie Woodard | 100Reporters 31 Jan 2012 Hits:919 South Dakota

Read more

Daryl Hannah & Tribal Leaders Saddle Up to Block Keystone XL

Daryl Hannah & Tribal Leaders Saddle Up  to Block Keystone XL

Oglala Lakota Nation & Sicangu Lakota Nation Join “Tour of Resistance” Against TransCanada’s Tar Sands Pipeline October 27, 2011 (Pine Ridge, SD) – Today, actress/activist Daryl Hannah and members of the Oglala Lakota Nation and Sicangu Lakota Nation mounted their horses in a symbolic stand against TransCanada’s Keystone XL tar sands pipeline proposal. Dozens of horse riders and bicyclists joined the Keystone XL “Tour of Resistance” as it rolled through Pine Ridge towards Rosebud. The proposed pipeline route crosses the Oglala Sioux Rural Water Supply...

Press Release 27 Oct 2011 Hits:458 South Dakota

Read more

Protesters Occupy Vermillion

Protesters Occupy Vermillion

Former University of South Dakota student Phil Deveney took a second look at his most recent pay stub Saturday afternoon, of which $59 was taken out by the federal government. Deveney said his medical bills have been less than the amount he has paid in taxes and he is still paying for medical bills out of his pocket. "I don't know why I should pay to kill somebody when I can't take care of myself with the taxes I pay," Deveney said referencing the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Deveney was one of...

TJ Jerke | The Volante 15 Oct 2011 Hits:386 South Dakota

Read more

PDA In Your State

PDA Network - Shows This Week

banner-climatechange1019

wr10-20

banner-agitatorradio

BannerPoliticsofFaithAll

Banner-EndingHomelessnessAll

Sign the Petition

Button-DetroitWater

 

Leadership

PDA is looking for leadership in your state. Please contact us if you are interested in organzing at the state or chapter level.

State Leadership

Email us at: field@pdamerica.org

Chapters

Want to bring progressive change to your state? Start a PDA chapter; send us an email and we'll get you started.

Email us at: field@pdamerica.org

 

 

PDA Issues

PDA is organized around several core issues. These issues include:

Each team hosts a monthly conference call. Calls feature legislators, staffers and other policy experts. On these calls we determine PDA legislation to support as well as actions and future events.

SD Legislators with ALEC Ties

House of Representatives

Senate

Information from Sourcewatch:

PR Rank