f5be9bd204 -->
Washington BREAKING: Tim Eyman’s I-1053 has *finally* been struck down as unconstitutional!
gavelJoyous news to report out of the King County Courthouse this morning: Superior Court Judge Bruce Heller has just ruled that Tim Eyman’s I-1053 – the third in a series of initiatives undemocratically requiring two-thirds votes of both houses of the Legislature to raise revenue – is unconstitutional on multiple grounds.

The ruling, which Rob McKenna’s office already plans to appeal, marks the first time that a court of law in Washington State has ever decided a legal challenge against the right wing’s repeated efforts to undermine our plan of government with initiatives that undemocratically require two-thirds votes to raise or restore revenue.

Legal challenges to I-1053?s predecessors (I-601, I-960) were dismissed on technicalities and went nowhere; but this time, Judge Heller found that the lawsuit against I-1053 was justiciable and properly brought, and proceeded to rule on the merits of the case, as the plaintiffs had urged him to do.

The judge found that I-1053 violates two provisions of the Constitution: Article II, Section 22, and Article II, Section 1(b):

The majority provision of Article II, Section 22 is a clear restriction on the Legislature’s power to require more than a majority for passage of tax measures. This restriction applies to statutes initiated by the Legislature and to statutes passed pursuant to voter initiatives. While initiative measures reflect the reserved power of the people to legislate, the people in their legislative capacity remain subject to mandates of the Constitution. RCW 43.135.034(1) is therefore unconstitutional.

The mandatory referendum requirement of RCW 43.135.034(2) is unconstitutional for two reasons. First, it eliminates the four percent requirement embodied in Article II, Section 1(b). Second, by mandating the referral of a certain category of bills to the voters for approval, it prevents future Legislatures from exercising their lawmaking power under Article II, Section 1.

Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment is therefore granted. The State’s cross-motion for summary judgment is denied.

Paul Lawrence, the lead attorney for the plaintiffs (a coalition of NPI allies, which includes teachers, parents, Democratic lawmakers, and progressive organizations) unequivocally praised the decision. “This is a victory for the Constitution,” he said in a statement released by the League of Education Voters (LEV).

He added: “The Constitution establishes the fundamental rules for how our government works. The Framers considered what types of laws require a supermajority vote for passage. Taxes were not identified as requiring a supermajority vote. Fundamental changes in how the government operates have to be accomplished by constitutional amendment, not by passage of a law.”

Washington Education Association President Mary Lindquist characterized the ruling as a landmark decision.

“This decision is a victory for the children of Washington state,” she said. “If it is upheld, this ruling will pave the way for the Legislature to fully fund K-12 public schools as mandated by the Supreme Court’s McCleary decision and the state Constitution. We hope it will be settled soon. Our kids can’t wait any longer.”

The ruling drew a swift, boilerplate response from Tim Eyman. In an email titled “King County judge throws gasoline on the fire for Son of 1053?, Eyman tried to spin the decision as beneficial to I-1185 (his latest initiative, which is a clone of I-1053), and wrongly portray Judge Heller’s decision as a break with well-established precedent. From his opening paragraph:

Three times the state Supreme Court has decided to leave it to the Legislature and to the people to set the rules for raising taxes. Today a King County judge decided otherwise, contradicting various High Court rulings. The Attorney General’s team made – very persuasively – the exact same legal arguments that earned a unanimous 9-0 ruling in 2009 (written by the most liberal justice Mary Fairhurst).

But this particular judge chose to ignore those same arguments and disregard that previous ruling. Is it any wonder that opponents chose to file their case before a Seattle judge? Thank goodness the Attorney General will appeal.

Despite having spent more than a decade pushing initiatives and representing powerful interests like BP and ConcoPhillips as their brash, unelected lawmaker, Tim Eyman’s understanding of the law remains no better than it was back at the end of the 1990s, when Eyman sponsored his first unconstitutional initiative (I-695). That much is evident from his commentary on this and other legal challenges. Bruce Heller is one of King County’s most respected Superior Court judges, according to a recent survey of attorneys by the King County Bar Association (PDF).

When Eyman says the Supreme Court has decided “three times” to “leave it to the Legislature and the people to set the rules for raising taxes”, he is referring to three specific cases (Walker v. Munro, Futurewise v. Reed, and Brown v. Owen) where the Supreme Court declined to take up constitutional challenges filed against I-1053?s predecessors. (Walker was filed in 1993, Futurewise in 2007, and Brown in 2008).

However, those lawsuits were not dismissed because the Court wanted to “leave it to the Legislature and to the people to set the rules for raising taxes”. Rather, they were dismissed because the Supreme Court found that they had not been properly brought. The case against I-1053, however, was thoughtfully prepared and extensively researched to ensure that it would not suffer the same fate as Walker, Futurewise, or Brown. The legal team representing the plaintiffs really did their homework prior to filing this challenge. And it shows.

I’ll let Judge Heller explain:

This case represents the first constitutional challenge to the supermajority and mandatory referendum requirements brought before a trial court. Unlike Walker and Brown, the plaintiffs are asking for declaratory relief instead of a writ of mandamus. In other words, they are requesting a ruling regarding the constitutionality of a statute, as opposed to an order requiring another branch of government to perform or refrain from performing an act.

For the reasons set forth in this opinion, the court concludes that this is an appropriate case for judicial review. The court also concludes that the proper procedure for implementing the supermajority and mandatory referendum requirements is to amend the Washington Constitution rather than to employ the initiative process.

Emphasis is mine. Heller then goes on to address Attorney General Rob McKenna’s objections to allowing the case to be decided on the merits:

Before reaching the merits, the court must address the State’s contention that this case should not be heard. Plaintiffs have brought their challenge to RCW 43.135.034 under the Uniform Declaratory Judgment Act, which authorizes courts to adjudicate “the rights, status and other legal relations” of the parties. RCW 7.24.010. To obtain a declaratory ruling, a party must show that the case either (1) raises an issue of public importance, or (2) is “justiciable” — one that involves an actual dispute between opposing parties having a genuine stake in the outcome, as opposed to a hypothetical or speculative disagreement. Nollette v. Christiansen, 155 Wn.2d 594, 598-99, 800 P.2d 359 (1990). ToRo Trade Sho-ws v. Collins, 144 Wn.2d 403, 411, 27 P.3rd 1149 (2001). The court concludes that both requirements are satisfied.

Contrary to what Eyman claims, Judge Heller’s ruling today does not contradict the Supreme Court rulings that ended Walker, Futurewise, and Brown. In dismissing those cases, the Supreme Court only looked at whether each suit had been properly brought, not whether a law requiring two-thirds supermajority votes to enact certain categories of bills passed constitutional muster. The Supreme Court concluded in each instance that it could not reach the constitutional question, and so left the matter unresolved – to the frustration of many Washingtonians.

But this case is different. As Judge Heller explained above, in this case, here the plaintiffs were not seeking a writ of mandamus from the Supreme Court like the plaintiffs were in Walker and Brown. Instead, the plaintiffs went to a trial court (King County Superior Court) and asked for declaratory relief. And they got it, because in making their prayer for relief, they crossed all of their t’s and dotted all of their i’s. They brought a sound legal challenge to an initiative that is unconstitutional on its face, and left the court with no choice other than to strike it down.

Governor Chris Gregoire has yet to issue a statement commenting on today’s ruling. However, we’re guessing that she is happy with it, given her past opposition to I-960 and I-1053, and her active interest in this case.

(The governor was independently represented by her own counsel during oral argument; her attorney urged Judge Heller to reject Attorney General Rob McKenna’s argument that the case should not be heard).

McKenna, for his part, wasted no time in announcing that he would be appealing the decision to the Supreme Court.

“We thank Superior Court Judge Heller for his thoughtful consideration of this matter,” McKenna said. “However, we will appeal this decision because we believe these voter-enacted laws are constitutional, and we are determined to defend the will of the voters, just as we defend laws passed by the Legislature.”

Who exactly is McKenna talking about when he says “we”? Who is he speaking for? Certainly not Governor Gregoire or legislative leadership – they believe I-1053 to be unconstitutional. Is McKenna thinking of his buddy Tim Eyman, the sponsor of I-1053, who was once his client? (For those who don’t know, prior to becoming Attorney General, Rob McKenna co-wrote Tim Eyman’s Initiative 747 in 2001. It was later struck down by the Supreme Court in 2007 as unconstitutional).

McKenna and Eyman are wrong in asserting that I-1053/I-960/I-601 are constitutional. Article II, Section 22 of our state Constitution is clear: Bills shall pass by majority vote. And majority vote means greater than fifty percent. No more, no less. When it comes to deciding the fate of legislation, a supermajority is like a submjaority – in either case, the minority controls the outcome, contrary to what the founders of our state intended.

McKenna and his solicitor general, Maureen Hart, have tried to claim that Article II only establishes a floor instead of a floor and a ceiling. Their position was rejected in a similar case decided in Alaska back in 2007 (Alaskans for Efficient Government Inc. v. State of Alaska) which was cited by Judge Heller in today’s decision, and which I have extensively written about. Here is Judge Heller again:

Consistent with Gerberding, the courts of California and Alaska have rejected the argument that a majority vote requirement in their constitutions constituted a floor, not a ceiling.


In Alaskans for Efficient Government, Inc. v State of Alaska, 153 P.3rd 296 (Alaska 2007), the court addressed the identical issue presented in this case: whether an initiative requiring a two-thirds legislative vote for the passage of tax increases was inconsistent with Art. II, §14 of the Alaska Constitution, which provides: “No bill may become law without an affirmative vote of the majority of the membership of each house.” Id. at 299. The Alaska Supreme Court reasoned that the inclusion of supermajority provisions elsewhere in the constitution was “convincing evidence of the framers’ intent to include provisions in the Alaska Constitution describing all instances in which supermajority votes could be required to enact a bill.” Id. at 301.

As pointed out in Alaskans for Efficient Government, with the exception of Washington, every state that has adopted supermajority or voter-approved requirements for enacting tax-related bills has done so through constitutional enactments or amendments. 153 P.3d at 299, n.12. Those states include Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Delaware, Florida, Kentucky, Louisiana, Michigan, Mississippi, Oklahoma, Oregon, and South Dakota. Id. Significantly, many of these states recognized the need to amend their constitutions, even though the language in many of their constitutions contained the same negative phraseology as Washington’s Article II, §22. Amended Exhibit L to Declaration of Paul Lawrence.

If Judge Heller’s ruling is upheld on appeal, as we hope it will be, I-1053 will be erased from the Revised Code of Washington, which would be a great thing. But the prospect of losing on appeal isn’t going to stop Eyman from trying to get I-1053 reenacted in the form of I-1185 this year; nor will it prevent Eyman’s cohorts in the Legislature from reintroducing I-1053 as a constitutional amendment, as I-1053 cosponsor Janea Holmquist Newbry said today that she plans to do next session. (Ironically, constitutional amendments require a two-thirds vote of each house of the Legislature before they can be submitted to the people for ratification, which is a high bar that Newbry and her sympathizers will find difficult to meet).

I-1053 has now suffered a preliminary defeat in a court of law. Now we move to the final round at the Supreme Court. But we also need to engage the people of Washington Sate in the court of public opinion. We need to reframe the debate around taxes, our common wealth, and fiscal responsibility. It’s vital that we do so. Our economic security, future prosperity, and quality of life depend on our efforts.


Link to the original article on Northwest Progressive Institute Advocate

blog comments powered by Disqus

States - Washington

Washington News

Prev Next Page:

The power team of Cantwell and Murray

The power team of Cantwell and Murray

"Neither of our "power team" has signed onto the "Three State Solution" for ERA ratification. Please give them call and encourage them to cosponsor Senate Joint Resolution 15, "Remove the ratification deadline from the Equal Rights Amendment." -  Walt Kloefkorn, PDA Washington   A normally reserved Sen. Maria Cantwell was exchanging bear hugs with fishermen in Seattle on Friday,  hours after the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency moved to stop a mammoth proposed mine near Alaska’s Bristol Bay, on grounds it would threaten the world’s greatest salmon fishery. Cantwell took the fishing industry’s cause,...

Joel Connelly | Seattle PI 03 Mar 2014 Hits:585 Washington

Read more

Is Thomas Frank’s pessimism about the Democrats premature?

In the Salon article The matter with Kansas now: The Tea Party, the 1 percent and delusional Democrats,  Thomas Frank writes: It wasn’t until several years later that I began to understand what a fascinating, upside-down extravaganza it was to see the right eat its way through the good sense of the nation. While the above quote is a good description, I think Frank is a little off the mark with this essay, as he was with “What’s the Matter With Kansas.” (His best book is “The Wrecking Crew: How Conservatives Ruined Government,...

Walt Kloefkorn | Washington Liberals 18 Feb 2014 Hits:724 Washington

Read more

Workers Won't Bend to Boeing's Blackmail in Washington

Workers Won't Bend to Boeing's Blackmail in Washington

Machinists at Boeing resoundingly voted down mid-contract concessions yesterday and then booed the union leaders who had pushed the proposal on a shocked membership. Their contract doesn’t expire until 2016, but the company is threatening to move production of the huge new 777X aircraft out of Washington state to avoid the union. Boeing even promised $10,000 apiece upon approval, but the workers didn’t take the bait, opposing the scheme by 67 percent. A line snaked around the union building in Everett as workers waited to vote on a proposal they’d only learned was...

Jenny Brown | Labor Notes 15 Nov 2013 Hits:910 Washington

Read more

Socialist Sawant wins City Council seat

Socialist Sawant wins City Council seat

Seattle City Council candidate Kshama Sawant, a “Socialist Alternative” insurgent, has unseated four-term incumbent Richard Conlin, with the latest batch of mail-in ballots nearly tripling Sawant’s lead to 1,148 votes. A year ago, Sawant was running against the Legislature’s most powerful Democrat, House Speaker Frank Chopp, charging that the “Democratic Party-majority government” had slashed billions from education programs while bestowing tax exemptions on “rich corporations.” On Thursday evening, however, the victorious “working class activist” Sawant was headed for a 36th District Democratic fundraiser sponsored by State Sen. Jeanne Kohn-Welles.  Sawant’s tireless journalist...

Joel Connelly | Seattle pi 15 Nov 2013 Hits:990 Washington

Read more

Kshama Sawant, Socialist Candidate, Is On The Verge Of Winning Seattle City Council Seat

Kshama Sawant, Socialist Candidate, Is On The Verge Of Winning Seattle City Council Seat

Voters in left-leaning Seattle, where police recently handed out snacks at a large marijuana festival and politicians often try to out-liberal each other, are close to electing a Socialist candidate to the City Council. Following the latest ballot count Tuesday night, Kshama Sawant had a 402-vote lead over 16-year incumbent Richard Conlin. Given Washington state's mail-in voting system, a winner won't be named for days or even weeks after the Nov. 4 election. Still, the strong showing by Sawant, a college economics professor and prominent figure in Seattle's Occupy Wall Street...

Manuel Valdes | The Huffington Post 15 Nov 2013 Hits:674 Washington

Read more

Sequestration cuts to trim essential services for seniors and people living with disabilit…

Sequestration cuts to trim essential services for seniors and people living with disabilities

Spokane City Councilman Jon Snyder and President of Aging and Long Term Care of Eastern Washington Nick Beamer announced that the Sequestration cuts passed by Congress are poised to have a negative effect for area seniors who depend on the services ALTCEW provides. For the five-county area served by Aging and Long Term Care of Eastern Washington (ALTCEW), Older Americans Act funding will be cut by $153,523 due to sequestration. At a recent meeting of the ALTCEW Governing Board, chaired by Snyder, action was taken to provide supplemental funding to reduce the...

City of Spokane 10 May 2013 Hits:2210 Washington

Read more

Port of Tacoma terminal reopens after picket

Port of Tacoma terminal reopens after picket

An arbitrator said that a picket line of retired longshore union workers that closed a key Port of Tacoma container terminal early Tuesday was not allowed under the provisions of the longshore contract, according to the group that was the subject of the protest. The Washington United Terminal was reopened Tuesday afternoon after the retirees removed pickets from the facility on Port of Tacoma Road. The pickets were trying to force action on their complaints regarding the Pacific Maritime Association’s alleged failure to pay retiree medical bills. The PMA represents waterfront employers...

John Gillie | The News Tribune 02 May 2013 Hits:1151 Washington

Read more

Hanford Nuclear Waste Site at Risk of Hydrogen Explosion, Report Warns

Hanford Nuclear Waste Site at Risk of Hydrogen Explosion, Report Warns

Following report of leaks, nuclear safety board finds dangerous hydrogen build up in waste holding tanks Tanks at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation, which sits on the Columbia River in Benton County, Washington face dangerous risk of hydrogen build up which could trigger an explosion of radioactive materials, a nuclear safety board announced on Monday. The Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board expressed these concerns in a briefing letter to Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), chairman of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, who sought the board's review ahead of next week's confirmation hearing...

Lauren McCauley | Common Dreams 03 Apr 2013 Hits:1800 Washington

Read more

Who’s progressive in the Washington State Senate? — based on combined data from four score…

Who’s progressive in the Washington State Senate? — based on combined data from four scorecards

  Here is the list of four scorecards on which the rank is based: Washington Conservation Voters Legislative Scorecard 2011-2012 Washington State Labor Council 2012 SENATE Voting Record Facing Race: 2012 Legislative Report Card on Racial Equity 2012 Washington Conservative Union Ratings of the State Senate   The combined score is based on the four component scores and the formula: Combined Score = labor_lifetime + conservation_lifetime + racial_justice - conservative. Each component score is from 0 to 100.  The combined scores are shown below, ordered from highest to lowest. The raw component data is further below. Democrats are shown in...

Don Smith | Washington Liberals 24 Mar 2013 Hits:1428 Washington

Read more

Rep. Jim McDermott on the Ryan Budget (video)

Representative Jim McDermott talks about deficit and our national priorities at the House Budget Committee Markup of the Paul Ryan Budget.     Details can be found here: Progressive Caucus Leaders Release the Back to Work Budget to Create 7 Million Jobs  

14 Mar 2013 Hits:846 Washington

Read more

Washington’s Democratic representatives, except for Jim McDermott, are willing to cut Soci…

Washington’s Democratic representatives, except for Jim McDermott, are willing to cut Social Security

On Feb 15 a majority of House Democrats released a letter: Majority of House Democrats Call on President Obama to Reject Benefit Cuts to Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security Benefits. But the only Washington State representative who has signed the above letter is Rep. Jim McDermott.   Democratic Representatives Smith, DelBene, Larsen, Kilmer, and Heck haven’t signed on. Moreover, Ivan Weiss reports that he asked newly elected 1st CD Rep. Suzan DelBene whether she would pledge not to support the “chained CPI” plan. She refused to make that pledge. Walter Kloefkorn, of PDA, reports...

Don Smith | Washington Liberals 16 Feb 2013 Hits:1116 Washington

Read more

Seattle’s Teacher Uprising: High School Faculty Faces Censure for Boycotting Standardized …

Seattle’s Teacher Uprising: High School Faculty Faces Censure for Boycotting Standardized MAP Tests

Earlier this month, teachers at Garfield High School in Seattle, Washington, voted unanimously to stop administering a widely used standardized test, calling them wasteful and unfairly used to grade their performance. They are now facing threats of 10-day suspension without pay if they continue their boycott. We go to Seattle to speak with two guests: Jesse Hagopian, a high school history teacher and union representative at Garfield High School who has refused to administer the MAP standardized test, and Wayne Au, a ...

Democracy Now 30 Jan 2013 Hits:1437 Washington

Read more

Washington Health Security Trust – Single Payer Health Care Bill

A Single Payer Health Care bill has been introduced in the Washington State 2013 Legislature. The bill number is House Bill (HB) 1085. The legislation is called the Washington Health Security Trust (WHST). The original WHST proposal was written by members of Health Care for All – Washington, http://www.healthcareforallwa.org/. This proposal has been revised in HB 1085 to be compliant to the Affordable Care Act (PPACA), which makes WHST ready for a request to the Federal Government for use as a health care plan in Washington State in 2017. A hearing on...

From our friends at Health Care for All and Walter Kloefkorn 30 Jan 2013 Hits:1384 Washington

Read more

The Inevitable Republican Coup and Its Inevitable Silver Lining

The Inevitable Republican Coup and Its Inevitable Silver Lining

In a guest PubliCola op/ed, former lefty state Rep. Brendan Williams says the GOP coup was inevitable, but notes that there's a silver lining. In the fable of the scorpion and the frog, a frog (or tortoise) overcomes its misgivings and agrees to ferry a scorpion across a river after the scorpion persuasively notes that stinging the frog would cause both to sink and drown. Midway across, the scorpion stings the frog anyway, and, as they sink, the frog asks why. The scorpion’s response is...

Brendan Williams | PubliCola 13 Dec 2012 Hits:1565 Washington

Read more

Why We Can't Have Nice Things: WA Unions Turn Their Backs On Progressive Friends

Why We Can't Have Nice Things: WA Unions Turn Their Backs On Progressive Friends

If you want a nice, crystal-clear example of why it's so hard to elect strong, pro-labor progressives to Congress who fight for working families, look no further than the race in Washington's new 1st congressional district. It's a crowded field, and among them you can identify three strong, pro-labor progressives who have excellent track records when it comes to working families: Laura Ruderman, Steve Hobbs, and our own favorite, Darcy Burner. So who have the local unions (including the Washington State Labor Council,...

David Neiwert | Crooks and Liars 06 Jul 2012 Hits:1491 Washington

Read more

PDA In Your State

Sign the Petition



Washington Leadership

For support in organizing within your state, contact:
Walt Kloefkorn


State Leadership
Walt Kloefkorn

Email us at: field@pdamerica.org


2nd Congressional District
5th Congressional District
6th Congressional District
9th Congressional District

 Want to bring progressive change to Washington? Start a PDA chapter; send us an email and we'll get you started.

PDA Issues

PDA is organized around several core issues. These issues include:

Each team hosts a monthly conference call. Calls feature legislators, staffers and other policy experts. On these calls we determine PDA legislation to support as well as actions and future events.

WA Legislators with ALEC Ties

House of Representatives


Legislators Who Have Cut Ties With ALEC

  • Rep. Kevin Van De Wege (D-Sequim, Majority State Whip) - Van De Wege made the following statement to the organization "Fuse Washington" on his resignation from ALEC:
“I have decided to resign my membership from ALEC, effective April 11, 2012. As a legislator, my job is to represent the interests of all my constituents, not just those whose views align perfectly with mine. I have been a member of ALEC since I was first elected to the Legislature, and my very-limited participation enabled me to learn more about the organization’s legislative agenda and its stance on issues. I thought this insider’s view would help me to better understand those who do not agree with me politically, and in many ways, it has. However, my membership status is increasingly becoming a divisive issue this year, and I prefer to put my time and energy into efforts that unite our district rather than divide it.”[29]
  • Rep. Troy Kelley (D-28) - Kelley said he did attend one meeting but told Washington's Newsstand News that he does not participate in ALEC and is not a member.[30]
  • Rep. Brian Hatfield (D-19) - Hatfield announced in April 2012 that he has not renewed his ALEC membership and has no plans to attend upcoming ALEC meetings.[31]

Information from SourceWatch

PR Rank